Diagnostic activities, such as ultrasound scans and palpation, are relatively low-cost. They play a crucial role in the early detection of health problems and in assessing their progression. However, they are also error-prone activities, which require highly skilled medical staff. The use of robotic solutions can be key to decreasing the inherent subjectivity of the results and reducing the waiting list. For a robot to perform palpation or ultrasound scans, it must effectively manage physical interactions with the human body, which greatly benefits from precise estimation of the patient’s tissue biomechanical properties. This article assesses the accuracy and precision of a robotic system in estimating the viscoelastic parameters of various materials, including some tests on ex vivo tissues as a preliminary proof-of-concept demonstration of the method’s applicability to biological samples. The measurements are compared against a ground truth derived from silicone specimens with differe...
Diagnostic activities, such as ultrasound scans and palpation, are relatively low-cost. They play a crucial role in the early detection of health problems and in assessing their progression. However, they are also error-prone activities, which require highly skilled medical staff. The use of robotic solutions can be key to decreasing the inherent subjectivity of the results and reducing the waiting list. For a robot to perform palpation or ultrasound scans, it must effectively manage physical interactions with the human body, which greatly benefits from precise estimation of the patient’s tissue biomechanical properties. This paper assesses the accuracy and precision of a robotic system in estimating the viscoelastic parameters of various materials, including some tests on ex vivo tissues as a preliminary proof-of-concept demonstration of the method’s applicability to biological samples. The measurements are compared against a ground truth derived from silicone specimens with different viscoelastic properties, characterised using a high-precision instrument. Experimental results show that the robotic system’s accuracy closely matches the ground truth, increasing confidence in the potential use of robots for such clinical applications.
Force-Based Viscosity and Elasticity Measurements for Material Biomechanical Characterization With a Collaborative Robotic Arm / Beber, Luca; Lamon, Edoardo; Moretti, Giacomo; Saveriano, Matteo; Fambri, Luca; Palopoli, Luigi; Fontanelli, Daniele. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT. - ISSN 1557-9662. - 74:(2025), pp. 1-14. [10.1109/TIM.2025.3581663]
Force-Based Viscosity and Elasticity Measurements for Material Biomechanical Characterization With a Collaborative Robotic Arm
Luca Beber;Edoardo Lamon;Giacomo Moretti;Matteo Saveriano;Luca Fambri;Luigi Palopoli;Daniele Fontanelli
2025-01-01
Abstract
Diagnostic activities, such as ultrasound scans and palpation, are relatively low-cost. They play a crucial role in the early detection of health problems and in assessing their progression. However, they are also error-prone activities, which require highly skilled medical staff. The use of robotic solutions can be key to decreasing the inherent subjectivity of the results and reducing the waiting list. For a robot to perform palpation or ultrasound scans, it must effectively manage physical interactions with the human body, which greatly benefits from precise estimation of the patient’s tissue biomechanical properties. This article assesses the accuracy and precision of a robotic system in estimating the viscoelastic parameters of various materials, including some tests on ex vivo tissues as a preliminary proof-of-concept demonstration of the method’s applicability to biological samples. The measurements are compared against a ground truth derived from silicone specimens with differe...| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Force-Based_Viscosity_and_Elasticity_Measurements_for_Material_Biomechanical_Characterization_With_a_Collaborative_Robotic_Arm.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
4.28 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.28 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



