Abstract: The g-g-v diagram is a popular representation of a vehicle’s maximum longitudinal and lateral accelerations, as a function of its speed. Recently, g-g-v diagrams have been used as performance constraints for online minimum-time vehicle trajectory planning with economic nonlinear model predictive control (E-NMPC). However, in the related literature, the modeling accuracy of the g-g-v formulations was often compromised in favor of computational efficiency for online E-NMPC. This paper compares various formulations of the g-g-v constraints, evaluating their accuracy, computational efficiency and impact on the lap times, when applied by an artificial race driver (ARD) to control a sports car model on a circuit. Also, we propose a new g-gv diagram formulation, based on convex polytopic and non-convex polynomial constraints. Our formulation yields improved modeling accuracy while preserving a low computational burden for online E-NMPC. Finally, we analyze the vehicle trajectories, to understand how ARD achieves lower lap times through an improved knowledge of the maximum performance.

Impacts of g-g-v Constraints Formulations on Online Minimum-Time Vehicle Trajectory Planning / Piccinini, Mattia; Taddei, Sebastiano; Piazza, Mattia; Biral, Francesco. - 58:10(2024), pp. 87-93. ( 7th IFAC Symposium on Control of Transportation Systems CTS 2024 Ayia Napa 1st July-3rd July 2024) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.323].

Impacts of g-g-v Constraints Formulations on Online Minimum-Time Vehicle Trajectory Planning

Piccinini, Mattia;Taddei, Sebastiano;Piazza, Mattia;Biral, Francesco
2024-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: The g-g-v diagram is a popular representation of a vehicle’s maximum longitudinal and lateral accelerations, as a function of its speed. Recently, g-g-v diagrams have been used as performance constraints for online minimum-time vehicle trajectory planning with economic nonlinear model predictive control (E-NMPC). However, in the related literature, the modeling accuracy of the g-g-v formulations was often compromised in favor of computational efficiency for online E-NMPC. This paper compares various formulations of the g-g-v constraints, evaluating their accuracy, computational efficiency and impact on the lap times, when applied by an artificial race driver (ARD) to control a sports car model on a circuit. Also, we propose a new g-gv diagram formulation, based on convex polytopic and non-convex polynomial constraints. Our formulation yields improved modeling accuracy while preserving a low computational burden for online E-NMPC. Finally, we analyze the vehicle trajectories, to understand how ARD achieves lower lap times through an improved knowledge of the maximum performance.
2024
IFAC PapersOnline
Amsterdam
Elsevier
Piccinini, Mattia; Taddei, Sebastiano; Piazza, Mattia; Biral, Francesco
Impacts of g-g-v Constraints Formulations on Online Minimum-Time Vehicle Trajectory Planning / Piccinini, Mattia; Taddei, Sebastiano; Piazza, Mattia; Biral, Francesco. - 58:10(2024), pp. 87-93. ( 7th IFAC Symposium on Control of Transportation Systems CTS 2024 Ayia Napa 1st July-3rd July 2024) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.323].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024-Picinini etal-IFAC-comparison_ggv.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S2405896324004075-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.8 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/433731
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
  • OpenAlex 8
social impact