Abstract: The g-g-v diagram is a popular representation of a vehicle’s maximum longitudinal and lateral accelerations, as a function of its speed. Recently, g-g-v diagrams have been used as performance constraints for online minimum-time vehicle trajectory planning with economic nonlinear model predictive control (E-NMPC). However, in the related literature, the modeling accuracy of the g-g-v formulations was often compromised in favor of computational efficiency for online E-NMPC. This paper compares various formulations of the g-g-v constraints, evaluating their accuracy, computational efficiency and impact on the lap times, when applied by an artificial race driver (ARD) to control a sports car model on a circuit. Also, we propose a new g-gv diagram formulation, based on convex polytopic and non-convex polynomial constraints. Our formulation yields improved modeling accuracy while preserving a low computational burden for online E-NMPC. Finally, we analyze the vehicle trajectories, to understand how ARD achieves lower lap times through an improved knowledge of the maximum performance.
Impacts of g-g-v Constraints Formulations on Online Minimum-Time Vehicle Trajectory Planning / Piccinini, Mattia; Taddei, Sebastiano; Piazza, Mattia; Biral, Francesco. - 58:10(2024), pp. 87-93. ( 7th IFAC Symposium on Control of Transportation Systems CTS 2024 Ayia Napa 1st July-3rd July 2024) [10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.323].
Impacts of g-g-v Constraints Formulations on Online Minimum-Time Vehicle Trajectory Planning
Piccinini, Mattia;Taddei, Sebastiano;Piazza, Mattia;Biral, Francesco
2024-01-01
Abstract
Abstract: The g-g-v diagram is a popular representation of a vehicle’s maximum longitudinal and lateral accelerations, as a function of its speed. Recently, g-g-v diagrams have been used as performance constraints for online minimum-time vehicle trajectory planning with economic nonlinear model predictive control (E-NMPC). However, in the related literature, the modeling accuracy of the g-g-v formulations was often compromised in favor of computational efficiency for online E-NMPC. This paper compares various formulations of the g-g-v constraints, evaluating their accuracy, computational efficiency and impact on the lap times, when applied by an artificial race driver (ARD) to control a sports car model on a circuit. Also, we propose a new g-gv diagram formulation, based on convex polytopic and non-convex polynomial constraints. Our formulation yields improved modeling accuracy while preserving a low computational burden for online E-NMPC. Finally, we analyze the vehicle trajectories, to understand how ARD achieves lower lap times through an improved knowledge of the maximum performance.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2024-Picinini etal-IFAC-comparison_ggv.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.86 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
1-s2.0-S2405896324004075-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.8 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.8 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



