Signature schemes from multi-round interactive proofs are becoming increasingly relevant in post-quantum cryptography. A prominent example is CROSS, recently admitted to the second round of the NIST on-ramp standardisation process for post-quantum digital signatures. While the security of these constructions relies on the Fiat–Shamir transform, in the case of CROSS the use of the fixed-weight parallel-repetition optimisation makes the security analysis fuzzier than usual. A recent work has shown that the fixed-weight parallel repetition of a multi-round interactive proof is still knowledge sound, but no matching result appears to be known for the non-interactive version. In this paper, we provide two main results. First, we explicitly prove the EUF-CMA security of CROSS, filling a gap in the literature. We do this by showing that, in general, the Fiat–Shamir transform of an HVZK and knowledge-sound multi-round interactive proof is EUF-CMA secure. Second, we present a novel forgery attack on signatures obtained from fixed-weight repetitions of 5-round interactive proofs, substantially improving upon a previous attack on parallel repetitions due to Kales and Zaverucha. Our new attack has particular relevance for CROSS, as it shows that several parameter sets achieve a significantly lower security level than claimed, with reductions up to 24% in the worst case.

A Revision of CROSS Security: Proofs and Attacks for Multi-Round Fiat–Shamir Signatures / Battagliola, M., Longo, R., Pintore, F., Signorini, E., Tognolini, G.. - In: MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS. - ISSN 1660-5446. - 22:(2025), pp. 1-29. [10.1007/s00009-025-02882-7]

A Revision of CROSS Security: Proofs and Attacks for Multi-Round Fiat–Shamir Signatures

Pintore F.;Tognolini G.
2025-01-01

Abstract

Signature schemes from multi-round interactive proofs are becoming increasingly relevant in post-quantum cryptography. A prominent example is CROSS, recently admitted to the second round of the NIST on-ramp standardisation process for post-quantum digital signatures. While the security of these constructions relies on the Fiat–Shamir transform, in the case of CROSS the use of the fixed-weight parallel-repetition optimisation makes the security analysis fuzzier than usual. A recent work has shown that the fixed-weight parallel repetition of a multi-round interactive proof is still knowledge sound, but no matching result appears to be known for the non-interactive version. In this paper, we provide two main results. First, we explicitly prove the EUF-CMA security of CROSS, filling a gap in the literature. We do this by showing that, in general, the Fiat–Shamir transform of an HVZK and knowledge-sound multi-round interactive proof is EUF-CMA secure. Second, we present a novel forgery attack on signatures obtained from fixed-weight repetitions of 5-round interactive proofs, substantially improving upon a previous attack on parallel repetitions due to Kales and Zaverucha. Our new attack has particular relevance for CROSS, as it shows that several parameter sets achieve a significantly lower security level than claimed, with reductions up to 24% in the worst case.
2025
Battagliola, M.; Longo, R.; Pintore, F.; Signorini, E.; Tognolini, G.
A Revision of CROSS Security: Proofs and Attacks for Multi-Round Fiat–Shamir Signatures / Battagliola, M., Longo, R., Pintore, F., Signorini, E., Tognolini, G.. - In: MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS. - ISSN 1660-5446. - 22:(2025), pp. 1-29. [10.1007/s00009-025-02882-7]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A revision of CROSS Security.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 625.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
625.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/465899
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
  • OpenAlex 2
social impact