Background & Aims: Epidemiologic evidence for dietary influence on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk through the gut microbiome remains limited. Methods: Leveraging 307 men and 212 women with stool metagenomes and dietary data, we characterized and validated a sex-specific dietary pattern associated with the CRC-related gut microbial signature (CRC Microbial Dietary Score [CMDS]). We evaluated the associations of CMDS with CRC risk according to Fusobacterium nucleatum, pks+ Escherichia coli, and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis status in tumor tissue using Cox proportional hazards regression in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986–2018), Nurses’ Health Study (1984–2020), and Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2019). Results: The CMDS was characterized by high industrially processed food and low unprocessed fiber-rich food intakes. In 259,200 participants, we documented 3854 incident CRC cases over 6,467,378 person-years of follow-up. CMDS was associated with a higher risk of CRC (Ptrend < .001), with a multivariable hazard ratio (HRQ5 vs Q1) of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.13–1.39). The association remained after adjusting for previously established dietary patterns, for example, the Western and prudent diets. Notably, the association was stronger for tumoral F nucleatum–positive (HRQ5 vs Q1, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.68–3.75; Ptrend < .001; Pheterogeneity = .03, positivity vs negativity), pks+ E coli–positive (HRQ5 vs Q1, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.84–3.38; Ptrend = .005; Pheterogeneity = .01, positivity vs negativity), and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis–positive CRC (HRQ5 vs Q1, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.10–3.88; Ptrend = .016; Pheterogeneity = .06, positivity vs negativity), compared with their negative counterparts. Conclusions: CMDS was associated with increased CRC risk, especially for tumors with detectable F nucleatum, pks+ E coli, and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in tissue. Our findings support a potential role of the gut microbiome underlying the dietary effects on CRC.

An Empirical Dietary Pattern Associated With the Gut Microbial Features in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Risk / Wang, Kai; Lo, Chun-Han; Mehta, Raaj S.; Nguyen, Long H.; Wang, Yiqing; Ma, Wenjie; Ugai, Tomotaka; Kawamura, Hidetaka; Ugai, Satoko; Takashima, Yasutoshi; Mima, Kosuke; Arima, Kota; Okadome, Kazuo; Giannakis, Marios; Sears, Cynthia L.; Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.; Ng, Kimmie; Segata, Nicola; Izard, Jacques; Rimm, Eric B.; Garrett, Wendy S.; Huttenhower, Curtis; Giovannucci, Edward L.; Chan, Andrew T.; Ogino, Shuji; Song, Mingyang. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0016-5085. - 167:7(2024), pp. 1371-1383.e4. [10.1053/j.gastro.2024.07.040]

An Empirical Dietary Pattern Associated With the Gut Microbial Features in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Risk

Segata, Nicola;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background & Aims: Epidemiologic evidence for dietary influence on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk through the gut microbiome remains limited. Methods: Leveraging 307 men and 212 women with stool metagenomes and dietary data, we characterized and validated a sex-specific dietary pattern associated with the CRC-related gut microbial signature (CRC Microbial Dietary Score [CMDS]). We evaluated the associations of CMDS with CRC risk according to Fusobacterium nucleatum, pks+ Escherichia coli, and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis status in tumor tissue using Cox proportional hazards regression in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986–2018), Nurses’ Health Study (1984–2020), and Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2019). Results: The CMDS was characterized by high industrially processed food and low unprocessed fiber-rich food intakes. In 259,200 participants, we documented 3854 incident CRC cases over 6,467,378 person-years of follow-up. CMDS was associated with a higher risk of CRC (Ptrend < .001), with a multivariable hazard ratio (HRQ5 vs Q1) of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.13–1.39). The association remained after adjusting for previously established dietary patterns, for example, the Western and prudent diets. Notably, the association was stronger for tumoral F nucleatum–positive (HRQ5 vs Q1, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.68–3.75; Ptrend < .001; Pheterogeneity = .03, positivity vs negativity), pks+ E coli–positive (HRQ5 vs Q1, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.84–3.38; Ptrend = .005; Pheterogeneity = .01, positivity vs negativity), and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis–positive CRC (HRQ5 vs Q1, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.10–3.88; Ptrend = .016; Pheterogeneity = .06, positivity vs negativity), compared with their negative counterparts. Conclusions: CMDS was associated with increased CRC risk, especially for tumors with detectable F nucleatum, pks+ E coli, and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in tissue. Our findings support a potential role of the gut microbiome underlying the dietary effects on CRC.
2024
7
Wang, Kai; Lo, Chun-Han; Mehta, Raaj S.; Nguyen, Long H.; Wang, Yiqing; Ma, Wenjie; Ugai, Tomotaka; Kawamura, Hidetaka; Ugai, Satoko; Takashima, Yasut...espandi
An Empirical Dietary Pattern Associated With the Gut Microbial Features in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Risk / Wang, Kai; Lo, Chun-Han; Mehta, Raaj S.; Nguyen, Long H.; Wang, Yiqing; Ma, Wenjie; Ugai, Tomotaka; Kawamura, Hidetaka; Ugai, Satoko; Takashima, Yasutoshi; Mima, Kosuke; Arima, Kota; Okadome, Kazuo; Giannakis, Marios; Sears, Cynthia L.; Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.; Ng, Kimmie; Segata, Nicola; Izard, Jacques; Rimm, Eric B.; Garrett, Wendy S.; Huttenhower, Curtis; Giovannucci, Edward L.; Chan, Andrew T.; Ogino, Shuji; Song, Mingyang. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0016-5085. - 167:7(2024), pp. 1371-1383.e4. [10.1053/j.gastro.2024.07.040]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS0016508524053009.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.39 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/464477
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact