Addressing the growing need for nuanced understandings of entrepreneurial contexts, this article presents a multifaceted pragmatic framework for scrutinising the ‘field of entrepreneurship’ and its associated dynamics. Drawing on Bourdieu's theory of practice and the institutional logics perspective, we introduce the concept of the field as a mid-level analytical lens—positioned between micro and macro perspectives—that captures the complex interplay of agency and structure in entrepreneurial activity. Our conceptualisation of the field enables the dissection of structural logics and actor dispositions, alongside the institutional processes that shape the entrepreneurial landscape. In response to calls for innovative methodologies in entrepreneurship research, we propose a combined analytical approach to unpack the layered complexities of entrepreneurial contexts, from individual actors to broader institutional influences. The utilisation of this ‘field of entrepreneurship’ concept, with a particular focus on field dynamics, serves as a pragmatic analytical unit, contributing to the broader discourse by balancing simplicity, accuracy, and generalisability. This research consequently offers a novel methodological avenue for exploring what facilitates or impedes entrepreneurial activity within varying contexts.

Field dynamics as context – a multi-perspective combined analysis of the effects of context on entrepreneurship / Alterskye, Alex; Fuller, Ted; Caputo, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING INSIGHTS. - ISSN 2352-6734. - 20:(2023), pp. 1-25. [10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00431]

Field dynamics as context – a multi-perspective combined analysis of the effects of context on entrepreneurship

Caputo, Andrea
2023-01-01

Abstract

Addressing the growing need for nuanced understandings of entrepreneurial contexts, this article presents a multifaceted pragmatic framework for scrutinising the ‘field of entrepreneurship’ and its associated dynamics. Drawing on Bourdieu's theory of practice and the institutional logics perspective, we introduce the concept of the field as a mid-level analytical lens—positioned between micro and macro perspectives—that captures the complex interplay of agency and structure in entrepreneurial activity. Our conceptualisation of the field enables the dissection of structural logics and actor dispositions, alongside the institutional processes that shape the entrepreneurial landscape. In response to calls for innovative methodologies in entrepreneurship research, we propose a combined analytical approach to unpack the layered complexities of entrepreneurial contexts, from individual actors to broader institutional influences. The utilisation of this ‘field of entrepreneurship’ concept, with a particular focus on field dynamics, serves as a pragmatic analytical unit, contributing to the broader discourse by balancing simplicity, accuracy, and generalisability. This research consequently offers a novel methodological avenue for exploring what facilitates or impedes entrepreneurial activity within varying contexts.
2023
Alterskye, Alex; Fuller, Ted; Caputo, Andrea
Field dynamics as context – a multi-perspective combined analysis of the effects of context on entrepreneurship / Alterskye, Alex; Fuller, Ted; Caputo, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING INSIGHTS. - ISSN 2352-6734. - 20:(2023), pp. 1-25. [10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00431]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JBVI-D-23-00186 revision REF FINAL.pdf

embargo fino al 04/10/2025

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 506.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
506.52 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S2352673423000604-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.2 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/392669
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact