This dissertation aims at providing a general theoretical framework through which teacher effects can be analyzed through a sociological perspective in the Italian educational system. This framework accounts for 1) tertiary effects, defined as the impact teachers have on students’ educational decisions, also indirectly via students’ evaluations, according to their variation in expectations and biases related to students’ sociodemographic characteristics; 2) primary effects related to teachers, defined as the impact teachers have on students’ performance according to their grading preferences, quality, characteristics. The empirical chapters provide three different empirical examples framed in the sociological literature about tertiary effects, relying on quantitative methodological approaches for the study of teacher bias. The common methodological framework of the empirical chapters relies on the study of grading practices, as a comparison between an “objective” and unbiased measure of students’ competences, such as standardized test scores, and teacher grades, which are thought to be more subjective and possibly biased measure of students’ academic ability.
When the Teacher Marks the Difference. Grading Practices, Social Inequalities, and Student Educational Outcomes / Lievore, Ilaria. - (2023 Jun 06), p. 1. [10.15168/11572_378515]
When the Teacher Marks the Difference. Grading Practices, Social Inequalities, and Student Educational Outcomes.
Lievore, Ilaria
2023-06-06
Abstract
This dissertation aims at providing a general theoretical framework through which teacher effects can be analyzed through a sociological perspective in the Italian educational system. This framework accounts for 1) tertiary effects, defined as the impact teachers have on students’ educational decisions, also indirectly via students’ evaluations, according to their variation in expectations and biases related to students’ sociodemographic characteristics; 2) primary effects related to teachers, defined as the impact teachers have on students’ performance according to their grading preferences, quality, characteristics. The empirical chapters provide three different empirical examples framed in the sociological literature about tertiary effects, relying on quantitative methodological approaches for the study of teacher bias. The common methodological framework of the empirical chapters relies on the study of grading practices, as a comparison between an “objective” and unbiased measure of students’ competences, such as standardized test scores, and teacher grades, which are thought to be more subjective and possibly biased measure of students’ academic ability.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Lievore_PhD dissertation.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Dissertation
Tipologia:
Tesi di dottorato (Doctoral Thesis)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
4.83 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.83 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione