Despite wide variation among natural languages, there are linguistic properties thought to be universal to all or nearly all languages. Here, we consider universals at the semantic level, in the domain of quantifiers, which are given by the properties of monotonicity, quantity, and conservativity, and we investigate whether these universals might be explained by differences in complexity. First, we use a minimal pair methodology and compare the complexities of individual quantifiers using approximate Kolmogorov complexity. Second, we use a simple yet expressive grammar to generate a large collection of quantifiers and we investigate their complexities at an aggregate level in terms of both their minimal description lengths and their approximate Kolmogorov complexities. For minimal description length we find that quantifiers satisfying semantic universals are simpler: they have a shorter minimal description length. For approximate Kolmogorov complexity we find that monotone quantifiers have a lower Kolmogorov complexity than non-monotone quantifiers and for quantity and conservativity we find that approximate Kolmogorov complexity does not scale robustly. These results suggest that the simplicity of quantifier meanings, in terms of their minimal description length, partially explains the presence of semantic universals in the domain of quantifiers.

Quantifiers satisfying semantic universals have shorter minimal description length / van de Pol, Iris; Lodder, Paul; van Maanen, Leendert; Steinert-Threlkeld, Shane; Szymanik, Jakub. - In: COGNITION. - ISSN 0010-0277. - 232:(2023), pp. 10515001-10515029. [10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105150]

Quantifiers satisfying semantic universals have shorter minimal description length

Szymanik, Jakub
2023-01-01

Abstract

Despite wide variation among natural languages, there are linguistic properties thought to be universal to all or nearly all languages. Here, we consider universals at the semantic level, in the domain of quantifiers, which are given by the properties of monotonicity, quantity, and conservativity, and we investigate whether these universals might be explained by differences in complexity. First, we use a minimal pair methodology and compare the complexities of individual quantifiers using approximate Kolmogorov complexity. Second, we use a simple yet expressive grammar to generate a large collection of quantifiers and we investigate their complexities at an aggregate level in terms of both their minimal description lengths and their approximate Kolmogorov complexities. For minimal description length we find that quantifiers satisfying semantic universals are simpler: they have a shorter minimal description length. For approximate Kolmogorov complexity we find that monotone quantifiers have a lower Kolmogorov complexity than non-monotone quantifiers and for quantity and conservativity we find that approximate Kolmogorov complexity does not scale robustly. These results suggest that the simplicity of quantifier meanings, in terms of their minimal description length, partially explains the presence of semantic universals in the domain of quantifiers.
2023
van de Pol, Iris; Lodder, Paul; van Maanen, Leendert; Steinert-Threlkeld, Shane; Szymanik, Jakub
Quantifiers satisfying semantic universals have shorter minimal description length / van de Pol, Iris; Lodder, Paul; van Maanen, Leendert; Steinert-Threlkeld, Shane; Szymanik, Jakub. - In: COGNITION. - ISSN 0010-0277. - 232:(2023), pp. 10515001-10515029. [10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105150]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S001002772200138X-main (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 7.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/364032
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact