Abstract: EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) have promising therapeutic potential beyond traditional neurofeedback training, such as enabling personalized and optimized virtual reality (VR) neurorehabilitation paradigms where the timing and parameters of the visual experience is synchronized with specific brain-states. While BCI algorithms are often designed to focus on whichever portion of a signal is most informative, in these brain-state-synchronized applications, it is of critical importance that the resulting decoder is sensitive to physiological brain activity representative of various mental states, and not to artifacts, such as those arising from naturalistic movements. In this study, we compare the relative classification accuracy with which different motor tasks can be decoded from both extracted brain activity and artifacts contained in the EEG signal. EEG data was collected from 17 chronic stroke patients while performing six different head, hand, and arm movements in a realistic VR-based neurorehabilitation paradigm. Results show that the artifactual component of the EEG signal is significantly more informative than brain activity with respect to classification accuracy. This finding is consistent across different feature extraction methods and classification pipelines. While informative brain signals can be recovered with suitable cleaning procedures, we recommend that features should not be designed solely to maximize classification accuracy, as this could select for remaining artifactual components. We also propose the use of machine learning approaches that are interpretable to verify that classification is driven by physiological brain-states. In summary, whereas informative artifacts are a helpful friend in BCI- based communication applications, they can be a problematic foe in the estimation of physiological brain states

Artifacts in EEG-based BCI therapies: friend or foe? / Mcdermott, Eric James; Raggam, Philipp; Kirsch, Sven; Belardinelli, Paolo; Ziemann, Ulf; Zrenner, Christoph. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 2022, 22:1(2022), pp. 9601-9618. [10.3390/s22010096]

Artifacts in EEG-based BCI therapies: friend or foe?

Belardinelli, Paolo;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) have promising therapeutic potential beyond traditional neurofeedback training, such as enabling personalized and optimized virtual reality (VR) neurorehabilitation paradigms where the timing and parameters of the visual experience is synchronized with specific brain-states. While BCI algorithms are often designed to focus on whichever portion of a signal is most informative, in these brain-state-synchronized applications, it is of critical importance that the resulting decoder is sensitive to physiological brain activity representative of various mental states, and not to artifacts, such as those arising from naturalistic movements. In this study, we compare the relative classification accuracy with which different motor tasks can be decoded from both extracted brain activity and artifacts contained in the EEG signal. EEG data was collected from 17 chronic stroke patients while performing six different head, hand, and arm movements in a realistic VR-based neurorehabilitation paradigm. Results show that the artifactual component of the EEG signal is significantly more informative than brain activity with respect to classification accuracy. This finding is consistent across different feature extraction methods and classification pipelines. While informative brain signals can be recovered with suitable cleaning procedures, we recommend that features should not be designed solely to maximize classification accuracy, as this could select for remaining artifactual components. We also propose the use of machine learning approaches that are interpretable to verify that classification is driven by physiological brain-states. In summary, whereas informative artifacts are a helpful friend in BCI- based communication applications, they can be a problematic foe in the estimation of physiological brain states
2022
1
Mcdermott, Eric James; Raggam, Philipp; Kirsch, Sven; Belardinelli, Paolo; Ziemann, Ulf; Zrenner, Christoph
Artifacts in EEG-based BCI therapies: friend or foe? / Mcdermott, Eric James; Raggam, Philipp; Kirsch, Sven; Belardinelli, Paolo; Ziemann, Ulf; Zrenner, Christoph. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 2022, 22:1(2022), pp. 9601-9618. [10.3390/s22010096]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
McDemott_SENS_2021_PREPR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.95 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.95 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
sensors-22-00096.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 8.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/325588
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact