The ongoing debate about Learning Design as a key field of educational research and practice is focused on understanding how intuitive processes The ongoing debate about Learning Design as a key field of educational research and practice is focused on understanding how intuitive processes undertaken by teachers and trainers can become visible (Learning Design as representation) and how can the pedagogical practices be re-shaped on the light of this representation (Learning Design as forward-oriented device). While there has been in the recent years a considerable attention devoted to develop sophisticated representational tools and means of Learning Design, the problem is whether these can be either adopted into the greenfield (that is, the daily practice of teaching and learning) and connected to educational quality (that is, effective teaching and learning according to negotiated educational values). I n this paper our attempt has been to explore how the process of design for learning can be connected with quality in a learning culture. The process of designing for learning within a blended, undergraduated university course is explored through a teacher-led inquiry, attempting to show the connections between designing for learning and the reflections from the academic staff and the students on the quality culture as meta-learning activity leading to competences to participate in such quality culture, or "quality literacy". These connections are an evidence that reinforces the importance of conceiving Learning Design as dynamic activity on the greenfield, that is, adopting learning design to explore methods of transforming existing situations into desired situations.
Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality / Ghislandi, Patrizia Maria Margherita; Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1013. - STAMPA. - 46:2(2015), pp. 280-299. [10.1111/bjet.12257]
Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality
Ghislandi, Patrizia Maria Margherita;Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa
2015-01-01
Abstract
The ongoing debate about Learning Design as a key field of educational research and practice is focused on understanding how intuitive processes The ongoing debate about Learning Design as a key field of educational research and practice is focused on understanding how intuitive processes undertaken by teachers and trainers can become visible (Learning Design as representation) and how can the pedagogical practices be re-shaped on the light of this representation (Learning Design as forward-oriented device). While there has been in the recent years a considerable attention devoted to develop sophisticated representational tools and means of Learning Design, the problem is whether these can be either adopted into the greenfield (that is, the daily practice of teaching and learning) and connected to educational quality (that is, effective teaching and learning according to negotiated educational values). I n this paper our attempt has been to explore how the process of design for learning can be connected with quality in a learning culture. The process of designing for learning within a blended, undergraduated university course is explored through a teacher-led inquiry, attempting to show the connections between designing for learning and the reflections from the academic staff and the students on the quality culture as meta-learning activity leading to competences to participate in such quality culture, or "quality literacy". These connections are an evidence that reinforces the importance of conceiving Learning Design as dynamic activity on the greenfield, that is, adopting learning design to explore methods of transforming existing situations into desired situations.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2015 ghislandi raffaghelli.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: testo paper
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
257.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
257.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
0394-R2_Table-1.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: table 1
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (Other attachments)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
22.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
22.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
0394-R2_Table-2.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: table 2
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (Other attachments)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
18.28 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
18.28 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
0394-R2_Table-3.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: table 3
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (Other attachments)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
24.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
24.83 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
0394-R2_Table-4.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: table 4
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (Other attachments)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
20.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
20.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
0394-R2_Figure-1-converted.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato (Other attachments)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
238.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
238.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Ghislandi2015.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
231.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
231.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione