The aim of the present study was to determine whether and how hand shaping was affected by the presence of a distractor object adjacent to the tobe- grasped object. Twenty subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp a ‘convex’ or a ‘concave’ object in the presence or absence of a distractor object either of the same or different shape than the target object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits, and abduction angle between digits were measured by resistive sensors embedded in a glove. The results indicate robust interference effects at the level of reach duration and the extent of fingers’ abduction angles together with changes at the level of a single joint for the thumb. No distractor effects on individual fingers’ joints except for the MCP of the middle and little fingers were found. These findings suggest that the presence of distractor object affects hand shaping in terms of fingers’ abduction angles, but not at the level of ‘shape dependent’ fingers’ angular excursions. Furthermore, they support the importance of the thumb for the guidance of selective reach-to-grasp movements. We discuss these results in the context of current theories proposed to explain the object selection processes underlying the control of hand action.
Distractor objects affect fingers’ angular distances but not fingers’shaping during grasping
Turella, Luca;Castiello, Umberto
2007-01-01
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine whether and how hand shaping was affected by the presence of a distractor object adjacent to the tobe- grasped object. Twenty subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp a ‘convex’ or a ‘concave’ object in the presence or absence of a distractor object either of the same or different shape than the target object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits, and abduction angle between digits were measured by resistive sensors embedded in a glove. The results indicate robust interference effects at the level of reach duration and the extent of fingers’ abduction angles together with changes at the level of a single joint for the thumb. No distractor effects on individual fingers’ joints except for the MCP of the middle and little fingers were found. These findings suggest that the presence of distractor object affects hand shaping in terms of fingers’ abduction angles, but not at the level of ‘shape dependent’ fingers’ angular excursions. Furthermore, they support the importance of the thumb for the guidance of selective reach-to-grasp movements. We discuss these results in the context of current theories proposed to explain the object selection processes underlying the control of hand action.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione