Popper and Hayek on reason and tradition

Karl Popper and Friedrich von Hayek became close friends soon after they first met in the early 1930s. Ever since, they discussed their ideas intensively on many occasions. But even though an analysis of the origins and contents of their ideas and of their correspondence reveals a number of important and fundamental differences, they rarely criticize each other in their published work. The article analyzes in particular the different ideas they have on the role of reason in society and on rationalism, and the roots of these differences – which lie in the work of David Hume. Popper’s “Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition” of 1948 contains a criticism of Hayek’s idea, published, for instance, in “Individualism: True and False” of 1945, that we must accept tradition without trying to change it. An analysis of the differences between the two authors touches upon topics such as the possibility of public intervention in society, the role of social science in this, the methodology of social science, and the differences between liberalism and social democracy. The article concludes with some possible explanations for Popper and Hayek downplaying their differences in public. The fact remains that they never resolved the tension between Popper’s critical rationalism and Hayek’s conservative rationalism.