This paper focuses on content analysis techniques for evaluating the role of non-narrative/visual disclosure in corporate social and environmental reports. The research examines 98 reports from Italian Cooperative Banks using different content analysis techniques to define stakeholder prioritisation, i.e. the total volume of disclosure for each stakeholder. The collected empirical data are used as a tool to address a methodological issue regarding the most appropriate method of quantification in content analysis. The first content analysis performed is based on narrative count, while the second analysis investigates visual count (pictures, graphs, and tables). The final investigation reveals that in determining stakeholder prioritisation, it is possible to neutrally apply content analysis based on narrative or visual counts. However, when discriminating among different categories of stakeholders, the use of narrative as opposed to visual content analysis produced diverse results. The research also found a massive occurrence of visuals in corporate social and environmental reports, which consequently implies that visual disclosure cannot and should not be ignored in content analysis studies.

Content analysis of social and environmental reports of Italian Cooperative Banks: methodological issues / Pesci, C., Costa, E.. - In: SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL. - ISSN 2156-2245. - STAMPA. - 2014, 34:3(2014), pp. 157-171. [10.1080/0969160X.2014.904239]

Content analysis of social and environmental reports of Italian Cooperative Banks: methodological issues

Pesci, Caterina
Primo
;
Costa, Ericka
Ultimo
2014-01-01

Abstract

This paper focuses on content analysis techniques for evaluating the role of non-narrative/visual disclosure in corporate social and environmental reports. The research examines 98 reports from Italian Cooperative Banks using different content analysis techniques to define stakeholder prioritisation, i.e. the total volume of disclosure for each stakeholder. The collected empirical data are used as a tool to address a methodological issue regarding the most appropriate method of quantification in content analysis. The first content analysis performed is based on narrative count, while the second analysis investigates visual count (pictures, graphs, and tables). The final investigation reveals that in determining stakeholder prioritisation, it is possible to neutrally apply content analysis based on narrative or visual counts. However, when discriminating among different categories of stakeholders, the use of narrative as opposed to visual content analysis produced diverse results. The research also found a massive occurrence of visuals in corporate social and environmental reports, which consequently implies that visual disclosure cannot and should not be ignored in content analysis studies.
2014
3
Pesci, Caterina; Costa, Ericka
Content analysis of social and environmental reports of Italian Cooperative Banks: methodological issues / Pesci, C., Costa, E.. - In: SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL. - ISSN 2156-2245. - STAMPA. - 2014, 34:3(2014), pp. 157-171. [10.1080/0969160X.2014.904239]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014 Pesci Costa 2014 SEAJ.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: PDF online-first
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 147 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
147 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Content Analysis of Social and Environmental Reports of Italian Cooperative Banks Methodological Issues.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: PDF pubblicato nel fascicolo della rivista
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 347.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
347.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/98494
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 33
social impact