Bidding rules that guarantee procedural fairness may induce more equilibrium bidding and moderate other-regarding concerns. Here, we investigate procedural fairness as in Güth (2011). In our experiment, we assume commonly known true values and only two bidders to implement a best-case scenario for other-regarding concerns. The two-by-two factorial design varies ownership of the single indivisible commodity and the price rule. We find more equilibrium behavior under the procedurally fairer price rule, although this does not completely crowd out otherregarding concerns. In addition, the limits of procedural fairness are much more important than expected. © 2013 Mohr Siebeck.

Does Procedural Fairness Crowd out Other-Regarding Concerns? A Bidding Experiment

Ploner, Matteo
Ultimo
2013-01-01

Abstract

Bidding rules that guarantee procedural fairness may induce more equilibrium bidding and moderate other-regarding concerns. Here, we investigate procedural fairness as in Güth (2011). In our experiment, we assume commonly known true values and only two bidders to implement a best-case scenario for other-regarding concerns. The two-by-two factorial design varies ownership of the single indivisible commodity and the price rule. We find more equilibrium behavior under the procedurally fairer price rule, although this does not completely crowd out otherregarding concerns. In addition, the limits of procedural fairness are much more important than expected. © 2013 Mohr Siebeck.
2013
3
Güth, Werner; Levati, M. Vittoria; Ploner, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
20_GUETH_LEVATI_PLONER_13_JITE.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 586.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
586.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/93840
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex 5
social impact