Using a laboratory experiment, we investigate whether incentive compatibility affects subjective probabilities elicited via the exchangeability method (EM), an elicitation technique consisting of several chained questions. We hypothesize that subjects who are aware of the chaining strategically behave and provide invalid subjective probabilities, while subjects who are not aware of the chaining state their real beliefs and provide valid subjective probabilities. The validity of subjective probabilities is investigated using de Finetti’s notion of coherence, under which probability estimates are valid if and only if they obey all axioms of probability theory. Four experimental treatments are designed and implemented. Subjects are divided into two initial treatment groups: in the first, they are provided with real monetary incentives, and in the second, they are not. Each group is further sub-divided into two treatment groups, in the first, the chained structure of the experimental design is made clear to the subjects, while, in the second, the chained structure is hidden by randomizing the elicitation questions. Our results suggest that subjects provided with monetary incentives and randomized questions provide valid subjective probabilities because they are not aware of the chaining which undermines the incentive compatibility of the exchangeabilitymethod.

Eliciting and estimating valid subjective probabilities: An experimental investigation of the exchangeability method / Cerroni, Simone; Notaro, Sandra; W. D., Shaw. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION. - ISSN 0167-2681. - STAMPA. - 84:1(2012), pp. 201-215. [10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.001]

Eliciting and estimating valid subjective probabilities: An experimental investigation of the exchangeability method

Cerroni, Simone;Notaro, Sandra;
2012

Abstract

Using a laboratory experiment, we investigate whether incentive compatibility affects subjective probabilities elicited via the exchangeability method (EM), an elicitation technique consisting of several chained questions. We hypothesize that subjects who are aware of the chaining strategically behave and provide invalid subjective probabilities, while subjects who are not aware of the chaining state their real beliefs and provide valid subjective probabilities. The validity of subjective probabilities is investigated using de Finetti’s notion of coherence, under which probability estimates are valid if and only if they obey all axioms of probability theory. Four experimental treatments are designed and implemented. Subjects are divided into two initial treatment groups: in the first, they are provided with real monetary incentives, and in the second, they are not. Each group is further sub-divided into two treatment groups, in the first, the chained structure of the experimental design is made clear to the subjects, while, in the second, the chained structure is hidden by randomizing the elicitation questions. Our results suggest that subjects provided with monetary incentives and randomized questions provide valid subjective probabilities because they are not aware of the chaining which undermines the incentive compatibility of the exchangeabilitymethod.
1
Cerroni, Simone; Notaro, Sandra; W. D., Shaw
Eliciting and estimating valid subjective probabilities: An experimental investigation of the exchangeability method / Cerroni, Simone; Notaro, Sandra; W. D., Shaw. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION. - ISSN 0167-2681. - STAMPA. - 84:1(2012), pp. 201-215. [10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.001]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Jebo 1.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 310.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
310.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
NOTARO 2012-Eliciting and estimating valid subjecti...tigation of the exchangeability method.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 364.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
364.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/93734
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact