Among numerical formats available to express probability, ratios are extensively used in risk communication, perhaps because of the health professional's intuitive sense of their clarity and simplicity. Moreover, health professionals, in the attempt to make the data more meaningful, tend to prefer proportions with a numerator of 1 and shifting denominators (e.g., 1 in 200) rather than equivalent rates of disease per unit of population exposed to the threat (e.g., 5 in 1000). However, in a series of 7 experiments, it is shown that individual subjective assessments of the same probability presented through proportions rather than rates vary significantly. A 1-in-X format (e.g., 1 in 200) is subjectively perceived as bigger and more alarming than an N-in-X*N format (e.g., 5 in 1000). The 1-in-X effect generalizes to different populations, probabilities, and medical conditions. Further-more, the effect is not attenuated by a communicative intervention (verbal analogy), but it disappears with an icon array visual aid.

The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities / Pighin, Stefania; Savadori, Lucia; Barilli, Elisa; L. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari; J. F., Bonnefon. - In: MEDICAL DECISION MAKING. - ISSN 0272-989X. - STAMPA. - 31:5(2011), pp. 721-729. [10.1177/0272989x11403490]

The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities

Pighin, Stefania;Savadori, Lucia;Barilli, Elisa;
2011

Abstract

Among numerical formats available to express probability, ratios are extensively used in risk communication, perhaps because of the health professional's intuitive sense of their clarity and simplicity. Moreover, health professionals, in the attempt to make the data more meaningful, tend to prefer proportions with a numerator of 1 and shifting denominators (e.g., 1 in 200) rather than equivalent rates of disease per unit of population exposed to the threat (e.g., 5 in 1000). However, in a series of 7 experiments, it is shown that individual subjective assessments of the same probability presented through proportions rather than rates vary significantly. A 1-in-X format (e.g., 1 in 200) is subjectively perceived as bigger and more alarming than an N-in-X*N format (e.g., 5 in 1000). The 1-in-X effect generalizes to different populations, probabilities, and medical conditions. Further-more, the effect is not attenuated by a communicative intervention (verbal analogy), but it disappears with an icon array visual aid.
5
Pighin, Stefania; Savadori, Lucia; Barilli, Elisa; L. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari; J. F., Bonnefon
The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities / Pighin, Stefania; Savadori, Lucia; Barilli, Elisa; L. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari; J. F., Bonnefon. - In: MEDICAL DECISION MAKING. - ISSN 0272-989X. - STAMPA. - 31:5(2011), pp. 721-729. [10.1177/0272989x11403490]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pighin et al., 2011, The 1-in-X effect, MDM.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 323.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
323.43 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/89289
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact