The weakness of knowledge-based authentication systems, such as passwords and Personal Identification Numbers (PINs), is well known, and reflects an uneasycompromise between securityand human memoryconstraints. Research has been undertaken for some years now into the feasibilityof graphical authentication mechanisms in the hope that these will provide a more secure and memorable alternative. The graphical approach substitutes the exact recall of alphanumeric codes with the recognition of previouslylearnt pictures, a skill at which humans are remarkablyproficient. So far, little attention has been devoted to usability, and initial research has failed to conclusivelyestablish significant memory improvement. This paper reports two user studies comparing several implementations of the graphical approach with PINs. Results demonstrate that pictures can be a solution to some problems relating to traditional knowledge-based authentication but that theyare not a simple panacea, since a poor design can eliminate the picture superiorityeffect in memory. The paper concludes by discussing the potential of the graphical approach and providing guidelines for developers contemplating using these mechanisms.
|Titolo:||Is a picture really worth a thousand words? Exploring the feasibility of graphical authentication systems|
|Autori:||De Angeli, Antonella; L., Coventry; G., Johnson; K., Renaud|
|Titolo del periodico:||INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES|
|Anno di pubblicazione:||2005|
|Numero e parte del fascicolo:||1-2|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.020|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||03.1 Articolo su rivista (Journal article)|