Inspection games are 2 × 2 games in which one player must decide whether to inspect the other player, who in turn must decide whether to infringe a norm or a regulation. Inspection games have a single, mixed strategy Nash equilibrium, which has counter-intuitive comparative statics properties. This result has been used by Tsebelis (1989) and Holler (1992) to show that the economic approach to law enforcement is not likely to generate clear-cut predictions. In this paper I discuss a variant of the inspection game in which the inspector can act as a Stackelberg leader. I will also show that this version of the inspection game has counter-intuitive comparative statics properties. In particular, increasing inspector’s incentives to enforce the law increases the frequency of law infractions.

Rewarding policemen increases crime: some more surprising results from the inspection game / Andreozzi, Luciano. - In: PUBLIC CHOICE. - ISSN 0048-5829. - STAMPA. - 121:1(2004), pp. 69-82.

Rewarding policemen increases crime: some more surprising results from the inspection game

Andreozzi, Luciano
2004-01-01

Abstract

Inspection games are 2 × 2 games in which one player must decide whether to inspect the other player, who in turn must decide whether to infringe a norm or a regulation. Inspection games have a single, mixed strategy Nash equilibrium, which has counter-intuitive comparative statics properties. This result has been used by Tsebelis (1989) and Holler (1992) to show that the economic approach to law enforcement is not likely to generate clear-cut predictions. In this paper I discuss a variant of the inspection game in which the inspector can act as a Stackelberg leader. I will also show that this version of the inspection game has counter-intuitive comparative statics properties. In particular, increasing inspector’s incentives to enforce the law increases the frequency of law infractions.
2004
1
Andreozzi, Luciano
Rewarding policemen increases crime: some more surprising results from the inspection game / Andreozzi, Luciano. - In: PUBLIC CHOICE. - ISSN 0048-5829. - STAMPA. - 121:1(2004), pp. 69-82.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Inspection_PublicChoice.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 120.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
120.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/74209
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact