Since the end of the cold war, the USA and the European Union (EU) have developed different foreign and security policies towards Africa. The USA has prioritised the fight against terrorism, while the EU's foreign policy has been primarily driven by the goal of structural stability. The difference between the two approaches can be partially explained by pointing to the different power resources of the two actors. Nevertheless, these structural differences have not prevented variations in how the two actors have redefined their foreign policy approaches over time and opted for alternative policy instruments. Comparison between the US and EU interventions in Sudan and Somalia shows that domestic factors account for the differences and variations in their respective foreign policy frameworks. This article argues that these differences and variations make the distinction between a ‘military America’ and a ‘civilian power Europe’ more nuanced than depicted by the mainstream literature on transatlantic relations.

An institutional approach to foreign policy-making: the EU, the USA and crisis management in Africa / Sicurelli, Daniela; Sergio, Fabbrini. - In: JOURNAL OF TRANSATLANTIC STUDIES. - ISSN 1479-4012. - 12:1(2014), pp. 41-61. [10.1080/14794012.2014.871433]

An institutional approach to foreign policy-making: the EU, the USA and crisis management in Africa

Sicurelli, Daniela;
2014

Abstract

Since the end of the cold war, the USA and the European Union (EU) have developed different foreign and security policies towards Africa. The USA has prioritised the fight against terrorism, while the EU's foreign policy has been primarily driven by the goal of structural stability. The difference between the two approaches can be partially explained by pointing to the different power resources of the two actors. Nevertheless, these structural differences have not prevented variations in how the two actors have redefined their foreign policy approaches over time and opted for alternative policy instruments. Comparison between the US and EU interventions in Sudan and Somalia shows that domestic factors account for the differences and variations in their respective foreign policy frameworks. This article argues that these differences and variations make the distinction between a ‘military America’ and a ‘civilian power Europe’ more nuanced than depicted by the mainstream literature on transatlantic relations.
1
Sicurelli, Daniela; Sergio, Fabbrini
An institutional approach to foreign policy-making: the EU, the USA and crisis management in Africa / Sicurelli, Daniela; Sergio, Fabbrini. - In: JOURNAL OF TRANSATLANTIC STUDIES. - ISSN 1479-4012. - 12:1(2014), pp. 41-61. [10.1080/14794012.2014.871433]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal of trans studies 2014.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 170.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
170.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/67802
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact