Machine learning is gaining momentum in criminology, and the unprecedented transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to affect the discipline even more, perhaps in ways we currently struggle to imagine. In light of the growing role that AI plays in our field and in science overall, this article pursues three objectives. First, I trace the historical roots of AI in criminology and survey current trends to take stock of research in this area. Second, I outline five directions for future research that I deem strategic for criminology as a whole, surpassing the longstanding schism between quantitative and qualitative scholarship: going beyond the idea that AI solely works for prediction or forecasting, building AI literacy, fostering transdisciplinary collaboration, encouraging systematic and comparative algorithmic evaluation, embracing agentic AI, and raising open science standards. Third, I propose a fundamental shift in perspective for how we discuss AI in our discipline. As autonomous AI agents proliferate and interact with minimal human oversight, we must move beyond treating AI as a passive tool. I argue for developing a criminology of machines—a framework examining how artificial agents may themselves become channels or perpetrators of criminal behavior.

Artificial Intelligence and Criminology / Campedelli, G.M.. - 2027:(In corso di stampa).

Artificial Intelligence and Criminology

Campedelli, Gian Maria
In corso di stampa

Abstract

Machine learning is gaining momentum in criminology, and the unprecedented transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to affect the discipline even more, perhaps in ways we currently struggle to imagine. In light of the growing role that AI plays in our field and in science overall, this article pursues three objectives. First, I trace the historical roots of AI in criminology and survey current trends to take stock of research in this area. Second, I outline five directions for future research that I deem strategic for criminology as a whole, surpassing the longstanding schism between quantitative and qualitative scholarship: going beyond the idea that AI solely works for prediction or forecasting, building AI literacy, fostering transdisciplinary collaboration, encouraging systematic and comparative algorithmic evaluation, embracing agentic AI, and raising open science standards. Third, I propose a fundamental shift in perspective for how we discuss AI in our discipline. As autonomous AI agents proliferate and interact with minimal human oversight, we must move beyond treating AI as a passive tool. I argue for developing a criminology of machines—a framework examining how artificial agents may themselves become channels or perpetrators of criminal behavior.
In corso di stampa
Campedelli, Gian Maria
Artificial Intelligence and Criminology / Campedelli, G.M.. - 2027:(In corso di stampa).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/510015
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact