As human microbiome research is globalizing, it raises ethical concerns regarding the European and North American dominance in the field, which may reproduce a colonial bias and perpetuate inequities in global health research and outcomes. We suggest disentangling this ethical quandary into three main concerns: 1) scientific bias toward European and North American populations; 2) limited meaningful community inclusion, participation, and ownership, and 3) scant significant inclusion of diverse global researchers. We then formulate three recommendations for their resolution, deploying co-laboration-joint labor of diverse partners in generating synergies between diverse disciplines, cultures, and knowledges around shared concerns-and co-laborative science-a form of citizen science based on such synergies between diverse partners-to guide meaningful inclusive, participatory, and ethical human microbiome research. To conclude, we promote a programmatic list for putting co-laborative ethical science into practice, benefiting global communities, individuals, and researchers alike and decolonizing and improving health worldwide.
Toward ethical human microbiome research: improving health through radical interdisciplinary and intercultural co-laboration / Van Daele, W., Tito Tadeo, R.Y., Perera, J., Tshokey, T., Iversen, P.O., Jayasinghe, S., Raffaetà, R., Wangmo, N., Fjeld, H.E., Sonam Chhoden, R., Thoradeniya, T., Raes, J.. - In: MICROBIOME. - ISSN 2049-2618. - 14:1(2026). [10.1186/s40168-026-02340-w]
Toward ethical human microbiome research: improving health through radical interdisciplinary and intercultural co-laboration
Raffaetà Roberta;
2026-01-01
Abstract
As human microbiome research is globalizing, it raises ethical concerns regarding the European and North American dominance in the field, which may reproduce a colonial bias and perpetuate inequities in global health research and outcomes. We suggest disentangling this ethical quandary into three main concerns: 1) scientific bias toward European and North American populations; 2) limited meaningful community inclusion, participation, and ownership, and 3) scant significant inclusion of diverse global researchers. We then formulate three recommendations for their resolution, deploying co-laboration-joint labor of diverse partners in generating synergies between diverse disciplines, cultures, and knowledges around shared concerns-and co-laborative science-a form of citizen science based on such synergies between diverse partners-to guide meaningful inclusive, participatory, and ethical human microbiome research. To conclude, we promote a programmatic list for putting co-laborative ethical science into practice, benefiting global communities, individuals, and researchers alike and decolonizing and improving health worldwide.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



