: Conventional BOLD-fMRI relies on hemodynamic responses that are temporally and spatially indirect markers of neural activity. Developing alternative contrasts, sensitive to neuroelectrical phenomena, is a critical challenge in brain imaging. Spin-lock (SL) fMRI has shown promise in phantom studies for detecting magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity, but its in-vivo sensitivity and practicality remain unclear. This study evaluated whether SL contrast can effectively detect and localize human neuronal activation, benchmarked against complementary functional modalities, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 3T BOLD-fMRI, to assess the sensitivity of MR-based neuronal current imaging. Thirteen healthy young volunteers underwent SL-based imaging during 8 Hz visual stimulation, along with BOLD and MEG acquisitions. Subjects viewed quadrant-checkerboard stimuli to elicit localized cortical responses. Two balanced SL contrast mechanisms, rotary excitation (REX) and stimulus-induced rotary saturation (SIRS), were employed. Postprocessing targeted stimulus-locked signal fluctuations using a regression-filtering-rectification strategy. Phantom experiments tested sensitivity and analysis pipeline performance. MEG revealed robust stimulus-locked responses in the occipital cortex, with estimated local magnetic field amplitudes of ~0.07 nT. Conventional BOLD-fMRI confirmed reliable hemodynamic activation. In contrast, neither balanced REX nor balanced SIRS produced consistent stimulus-related activation in vivo. Phantom experiments subsequently yielded detection thresholds of 0.2 nT for REX and 0.6 nT for SIRS, exceeding the MEG-estimated physiological field amplitudes. Under the present experimental conditions, the tested spin-lock fMRI implementations did not achieve sufficient sensitivity for reliable in vivo detection of neuronal magnetic fields at 3T. Phantom and MEG-based estimates indicate that physiological field amplitudes in the visual cortex lie below current detection limits. These findings establish quantitative constraints on direct neuronal current imaging with MRI and provide a benchmark for future methodological developments aimed at bridging electrophysiology and functional MRI.

Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain / Capiglioni, M., Tabarelli, D., Tambalo, S., Turco, F., Wiest, R., Jovicich, J.. - In: HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING. - ISSN 1065-9471. - 47:11(2026). [10.1002/hbm.70624]

Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain

Milena Capiglioni
;
Davide Tabarelli;Stefano Tambalo;Jorge Jovicich
2026-01-01

Abstract

: Conventional BOLD-fMRI relies on hemodynamic responses that are temporally and spatially indirect markers of neural activity. Developing alternative contrasts, sensitive to neuroelectrical phenomena, is a critical challenge in brain imaging. Spin-lock (SL) fMRI has shown promise in phantom studies for detecting magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity, but its in-vivo sensitivity and practicality remain unclear. This study evaluated whether SL contrast can effectively detect and localize human neuronal activation, benchmarked against complementary functional modalities, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and 3T BOLD-fMRI, to assess the sensitivity of MR-based neuronal current imaging. Thirteen healthy young volunteers underwent SL-based imaging during 8 Hz visual stimulation, along with BOLD and MEG acquisitions. Subjects viewed quadrant-checkerboard stimuli to elicit localized cortical responses. Two balanced SL contrast mechanisms, rotary excitation (REX) and stimulus-induced rotary saturation (SIRS), were employed. Postprocessing targeted stimulus-locked signal fluctuations using a regression-filtering-rectification strategy. Phantom experiments tested sensitivity and analysis pipeline performance. MEG revealed robust stimulus-locked responses in the occipital cortex, with estimated local magnetic field amplitudes of ~0.07 nT. Conventional BOLD-fMRI confirmed reliable hemodynamic activation. In contrast, neither balanced REX nor balanced SIRS produced consistent stimulus-related activation in vivo. Phantom experiments subsequently yielded detection thresholds of 0.2 nT for REX and 0.6 nT for SIRS, exceeding the MEG-estimated physiological field amplitudes. Under the present experimental conditions, the tested spin-lock fMRI implementations did not achieve sufficient sensitivity for reliable in vivo detection of neuronal magnetic fields at 3T. Phantom and MEG-based estimates indicate that physiological field amplitudes in the visual cortex lie below current detection limits. These findings establish quantitative constraints on direct neuronal current imaging with MRI and provide a benchmark for future methodological developments aimed at bridging electrophysiology and functional MRI.
2026
11
Capiglioni, Milena; Tabarelli, Davide; Tambalo, Stefano; Turco, Federico; Wiest, Roland; Jovicich, Jorge
Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain / Capiglioni, M., Tabarelli, D., Tambalo, S., Turco, F., Wiest, R., Jovicich, J.. - In: HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING. - ISSN 1065-9471. - 47:11(2026). [10.1002/hbm.70624]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/497910
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact