From Landslide Detection to Multi-Source LLM-Based Reporting: A Complete Framework for Rapid Assessment of Post-Disaster Scenarios

Timely landslide detection and rapid qualitative assessment are fundamental to effective warning systems, hazard management, and risk mitigation. Yet, current practices that rely on on-site surveys and manual expert assessment remain risky, costly, and time-consuming. These limitations result in substantial delays between the event and the availability of actionable information. This study proposes a hybrid, multi-model framework that fuses RGB remote-sensing imagery with geospatial layers to enable timely landslide detection and actionable reporting. The pipeline couples an enhanced SegFormer (denoted as SDF-SegFormer-B2) model for landslide localization, a feature extraction technique for per-slide geo-attribute computation, and a lightweight instruction-tuned LLM (Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3) for structured, expert-style reporting. Although a few previous studies have explored landslide captioning, to our knowledge this is the first framework designed to generate structured technical reports enriched with terrain-context interpretation and qualitative intervention-priority indicators. Experiments use 26,758 georeferenced RGB tiles (64 x 64) with 3 m of spatial resolution from PlanetScope satellite imagery over Emilia-Romagna, Italy, with 68,592 annotated landslide boxes collected after the May 2023 rainfall events (similar to 200 mm in 48 h on 1-3 May; 200-250 mm in 48 h on 16-17 May). The proposed SDF-SegFormer-B2 segmentation model achieved a precision of 85.54%, recall of 72.31%, and an F1-score of 78.39% on the unseen test dataset. To evaluate the quality of the generated landslide reports, 100 images were selected for domain-expert assessment. Among these, 58% of the reports were rated as "Very Good," 30% as "Good," 8% as "Acceptable," and 4% as "Poor." When considering only reports with complete and accurate inputs, 81.48% were rated "Very Good," and 96.30% were rated either "Good" or "Very Good." By integrating complementary models and modalities, the proposed approach automates localization-to-reporting and enables the generation of terrain-aware landslide summaries that may support preliminary decision-making and rapid post-disaster screening.

Timely landslide detection and rapid qualitative assessment are fundamental to effective warning systems, hazard management, and risk mitigation. Yet, current practices that rely on on-site surveys and manual expert assessment remain risky, costly, and time-consuming. These limitations result in substantial delays between the event and the availability of actionable information. This study proposes a hybrid, multi-model framework that fuses RGB remote-sensing imagery with geospatial layers to enable timely landslide detection and actionable reporting. The pipeline couples an enhanced SegFormer (denoted as SDF-SegFormer-B2) model for landslide localization, a feature extraction technique for per-slide geo-attribute computation, and a lightweight instruction-tuned LLM (Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3) for structured, expert-style reporting. Although a few previous studies have explored landslide captioning, to our knowledge this is the first framework designed to generate structured technical reports enriched with terrain-context interpretation and qualitative intervention-priority indicators. Experiments use 26,758 georeferenced RGB tiles (64 × 64) with 3 m of spatial resolution from PlanetScope satellite imagery over Emilia–Romagna, Italy, with 68,592 annotated landslide boxes collected after the May 2023 rainfall events (~200 mm in 48 h on 1–3 May; 200–250 mm in 48 h on 16–17 May). The proposed SDF-SegFormer-B2 segmentation model achieved a precision of 85.54%, recall of 72.31%, and an F1-score of 78.39% on the unseen test dataset. To evaluate the quality of the generated landslide reports, 100 images were selected for domain-expert assessment. Among these, 58% of the reports were rated as “Very Good,” 30% as “Good,” 8% as “Acceptable,” and 4% as “Poor.” When considering only reports with complete and accurate inputs, 81.48% were rated “Very Good,” and 96.30% were rated either “Good” or “Very Good.” By integrating complementary models and modalities, the proposed approach automates localization-to-reporting and enables the generation of terrain-aware landslide summaries that may support preliminary decision-making and rapid post-disaster screening.