Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data suggest that docetaxel and enzalutamide interfere with androgen receptor translocation and signalling. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of their concurrent administration in the first-line treatment for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase II trial, previously untreated mCRPC patients were randomised 1:1 to receive eight 21-d courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 , oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily and oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d (arm DE), or the same treatment without enzalutamide (arm D). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients without investigatorassessed disease progression 6 months after the first docetaxel administration. Results: The 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel, prednisone and enzalutamide (n Z 120) or docetaxel and prednisone (n Z 126). The 6-month progression rate was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1e20.6) in arm DE and 27.8% (95% CI 22.8e39.4) in arm D (chi-squared test 10.01; P Z 0.002). The most frequent grade IIIeIV adverse events were fatigue (12.5% in arm DE versus 5.6% in arm D), febrile neutropenia (9.3% versus 4.0%) and neutropenia (7.6% versus 5.6%). Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide and docetaxel appears to be more clinically beneficial than docetaxel alone in previously untreated mCRPC patients, although serious adverse events were more frequent. Our findings suggest that first-line treatment with this combination could lead to an additional clinical benefit when prompt and prolonged disease control is simultaneously required. Clearly, these results should be considered cautiously because of the study’s phase II design and the absence of an overall survival benefit.
Docetaxel and prednisone with or without enzalutamide as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CHEIRON, a randomised phase II trial / Caffo, O., Ortega, C., Nolè, F., Gasparro, D., Mucciarini, C., Aieta, M., Zagonel, V., Iacovelli, R., De Giorgi, U., Facchini, G., Veccia, A., Palesandro, E., Verri, E., Buti, S., Razzini, G., Bozza, G., Maruzzo, M., Ciccarese, C., Schepisi, G., Rossetti, S., et al.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0959-8049. - 2021, 155:(2021), pp. 56-63. [10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.016]
Docetaxel and prednisone with or without enzalutamide as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CHEIRON, a randomised phase II trial
Caffo, O.;Veccia, A.;
2021-01-01
Abstract
Abstract Background: Pre-clinical data suggest that docetaxel and enzalutamide interfere with androgen receptor translocation and signalling. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of their concurrent administration in the first-line treatment for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase II trial, previously untreated mCRPC patients were randomised 1:1 to receive eight 21-d courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 , oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily and oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d (arm DE), or the same treatment without enzalutamide (arm D). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients without investigatorassessed disease progression 6 months after the first docetaxel administration. Results: The 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel, prednisone and enzalutamide (n Z 120) or docetaxel and prednisone (n Z 126). The 6-month progression rate was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1e20.6) in arm DE and 27.8% (95% CI 22.8e39.4) in arm D (chi-squared test 10.01; P Z 0.002). The most frequent grade IIIeIV adverse events were fatigue (12.5% in arm DE versus 5.6% in arm D), febrile neutropenia (9.3% versus 4.0%) and neutropenia (7.6% versus 5.6%). Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide and docetaxel appears to be more clinically beneficial than docetaxel alone in previously untreated mCRPC patients, although serious adverse events were more frequent. Our findings suggest that first-line treatment with this combination could lead to an additional clinical benefit when prompt and prolonged disease control is simultaneously required. Clearly, these results should be considered cautiously because of the study’s phase II design and the absence of an overall survival benefit.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cheiron EJC.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
491.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
491.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



