: Hypertension is a primary contributor to cardiovascular disease, and the leading risk factor for loss of quality adjusted life years. Up to 50% of the cases of hypertension in the US remain uncontrolled. Additionally, 8-18% of the hypertensive population have resistant hypertension, uncontrolled pressure despite three different anti-hypertensive agents. Recently, catheter-based, percutaneous renal denervation emerged as a method for ablating renal sympathetic nerves for difficult to control hypertension. Initial randomized (non-sham) trials and registry analyses showed impressive benefit, but the first sham-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) using monopolar radiofrequency ablation showed limited benefit. With refinement of techniques to include multipolar radiofrequency, ultrasound denervation, and direct ethanol injection, RCTs demonstrated significant blood pressure improvement, leading to FDA approval of radiofrequency and ultrasound-based denervation technologies. In this review article, we summarize the major randomized sham-controlled trials and societal guidelines regarding the efficacy and safety of renal artery denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension.

Opportunities and Limitations of Renal Denervation: Where Do We Stand? / Rodriguez, B.C., Secemsky, E.A., Swaminathan, R.V., Feldman, D.N., Schlaich, M., Battaglia, Y., Filippone, E., Krittanawong, C.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0002-9343. - 2024:(2024), pp. 1-1. [10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.04.006]

Opportunities and Limitations of Renal Denervation: Where Do We Stand?

Battaglia, Yuri;
2024-01-01

Abstract

: Hypertension is a primary contributor to cardiovascular disease, and the leading risk factor for loss of quality adjusted life years. Up to 50% of the cases of hypertension in the US remain uncontrolled. Additionally, 8-18% of the hypertensive population have resistant hypertension, uncontrolled pressure despite three different anti-hypertensive agents. Recently, catheter-based, percutaneous renal denervation emerged as a method for ablating renal sympathetic nerves for difficult to control hypertension. Initial randomized (non-sham) trials and registry analyses showed impressive benefit, but the first sham-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) using monopolar radiofrequency ablation showed limited benefit. With refinement of techniques to include multipolar radiofrequency, ultrasound denervation, and direct ethanol injection, RCTs demonstrated significant blood pressure improvement, leading to FDA approval of radiofrequency and ultrasound-based denervation technologies. In this review article, we summarize the major randomized sham-controlled trials and societal guidelines regarding the efficacy and safety of renal artery denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension.
2024
Rodriguez, Beatriz Castillo; Secemsky, Eric A; Swaminathan, Rajesh V; Feldman, Dmitriy N; Schlaich, Markus; Battaglia, Yuri; Filippone, Edward; Kritta...espandi
Opportunities and Limitations of Renal Denervation: Where Do We Stand? / Rodriguez, B.C., Secemsky, E.A., Swaminathan, R.V., Feldman, D.N., Schlaich, M., Battaglia, Y., Filippone, E., Krittanawong, C.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0002-9343. - 2024:(2024), pp. 1-1. [10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.04.006]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/489934
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
  • OpenAlex 9
social impact