This paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of Environmental Assessment (EA) practices across Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Portugal, utilizing a best practices benchmark for integrating biodiversity considerations. The benchmark evaluates the degree of alignment between both Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) reports and best practices for biodiversity integration, offering insights into the effectiveness of current EA practices. We analyzed 191 EA reports, focusing on eight key themes: significance, knowledge, synergies and trade-offs, ecosystem services, goals and visions, uncertainty, mitigation and enhancement, and monitoring. The results highlight both areas of strength, such as the use of monitoring, and areas requiring improvement, such as the integration of ecosystem services and management of synergies and trade-offs. The findings provide a basis for enhancing EA practices and ultimately promoting biodiversity conservation in spatial planning.

Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments / Kørnøv, Lone; Vammen Larsen, Sanne; Eliasen, Søren Qvist; Ravn Boess, Emilia; Geneletti, Davide; Laporta, Lia; Soares, Ana; Zhu, Yuanzao; Monteiro, Margarida; Partidario, Maria Rosario; Locher-Krause, Karla E.; Wittmer, Heidi. - In: IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL. - ISSN 1461-5517. - 44:1(2026), pp. 51-67. [10.1080/14615517.2025.2604367]

Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments

Geneletti, Davide;Laporta, Lia;
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of Environmental Assessment (EA) practices across Denmark, Germany, Spain, and Portugal, utilizing a best practices benchmark for integrating biodiversity considerations. The benchmark evaluates the degree of alignment between both Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) reports and best practices for biodiversity integration, offering insights into the effectiveness of current EA practices. We analyzed 191 EA reports, focusing on eight key themes: significance, knowledge, synergies and trade-offs, ecosystem services, goals and visions, uncertainty, mitigation and enhancement, and monitoring. The results highlight both areas of strength, such as the use of monitoring, and areas requiring improvement, such as the integration of ecosystem services and management of synergies and trade-offs. The findings provide a basis for enhancing EA practices and ultimately promoting biodiversity conservation in spatial planning.
2026
1
Kørnøv, Lone; Vammen Larsen, Sanne; Eliasen, Søren Qvist; Ravn Boess, Emilia; Geneletti, Davide; Laporta, Lia; Soares, Ana; Zhu, Yuanzao; Monteiro, Ma...espandi
Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments / Kørnøv, Lone; Vammen Larsen, Sanne; Eliasen, Søren Qvist; Ravn Boess, Emilia; Geneletti, Davide; Laporta, Lia; Soares, Ana; Zhu, Yuanzao; Monteiro, Margarida; Partidario, Maria Rosario; Locher-Krause, Karla E.; Wittmer, Heidi. - In: IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL. - ISSN 1461-5517. - 44:1(2026), pp. 51-67. [10.1080/14615517.2025.2604367]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/484750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact