BACKGROUND The saphenous-vein graft is the most common conduit for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The influence of the vein-graft harvesting technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been well characterized. METHODS We randomly assigned patients undergoing CABG at 16 Veterans Affairs cardiac surgery centers to either open or endoscopic vein-graft harvesting. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Leg-wound complications were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 1150 patients underwent randomization. Over a median follow-up of 2.78 years, the primary outcome occurred in 89 patients (15.5%) in the open-harvest group and 80 patients (13.9%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.51; P=0.47). A total of 46 patients (8.0%) in the open-harvest group and 37 patients (6.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group died (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.92); myocardial infarc-tions occurred in 34 patients (5.9%) in the open-harvest group and 27 patients (4.7%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.11), and revascularization occurred in 35 patients (6.1%) in the open-harvest group and 31 patients (5.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.85). Leg-wound infections occurred in 18 patients (3.1%) in the open-harvest group and in 8 patients (1.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (relative risk, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 5.15). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing CABG, we did not find a significant difference between open vein-graft harvesting and endoscopic vein-graft harvesting in the risk of major adverse cardiac events. (Funded by the Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; REGROUP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01850082).

Randomized trial of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass / Zenati, Marco; Bhatt, Deepak L.; Bakaeen, Faisal G.; Stock, Eileen M.; Biswas, Kousick; Gaziano, Michael J.; Kelly, Rosemary F.; Tseng, Elaine E.; Bitondo, Jerene; Quin, Jacquelyn A.; Almassi, Hossein G.; Haime, Miguel; Hattler, Brack; Dematt, Ellen; Scrymgeour, Alexandra; Huang, Grant D.. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - 380:2(2019), pp. 132-141. [10.1056/NEJMoa1812390]

Randomized trial of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass

Zenati, Marco
;
2019-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND The saphenous-vein graft is the most common conduit for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The influence of the vein-graft harvesting technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been well characterized. METHODS We randomly assigned patients undergoing CABG at 16 Veterans Affairs cardiac surgery centers to either open or endoscopic vein-graft harvesting. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Leg-wound complications were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 1150 patients underwent randomization. Over a median follow-up of 2.78 years, the primary outcome occurred in 89 patients (15.5%) in the open-harvest group and 80 patients (13.9%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.51; P=0.47). A total of 46 patients (8.0%) in the open-harvest group and 37 patients (6.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group died (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.92); myocardial infarc-tions occurred in 34 patients (5.9%) in the open-harvest group and 27 patients (4.7%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.11), and revascularization occurred in 35 patients (6.1%) in the open-harvest group and 31 patients (5.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.85). Leg-wound infections occurred in 18 patients (3.1%) in the open-harvest group and in 8 patients (1.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (relative risk, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 5.15). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing CABG, we did not find a significant difference between open vein-graft harvesting and endoscopic vein-graft harvesting in the risk of major adverse cardiac events. (Funded by the Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; REGROUP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01850082).
2019
2
Settore MEDS-13/C - Chirurgia cardiaca
Zenati, Marco; Bhatt, Deepak L.; Bakaeen, Faisal G.; Stock, Eileen M.; Biswas, Kousick; Gaziano, Michael J.; Kelly, Rosemary F.; Tseng, Elaine E.; Bit...espandi
Randomized trial of endoscopic or open vein-graft harvesting for coronary-artery bypass / Zenati, Marco; Bhatt, Deepak L.; Bakaeen, Faisal G.; Stock, Eileen M.; Biswas, Kousick; Gaziano, Michael J.; Kelly, Rosemary F.; Tseng, Elaine E.; Bitondo, Jerene; Quin, Jacquelyn A.; Almassi, Hossein G.; Haime, Miguel; Hattler, Brack; Dematt, Ellen; Scrymgeour, Alexandra; Huang, Grant D.. - In: THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. - ISSN 0028-4793. - 380:2(2019), pp. 132-141. [10.1056/NEJMoa1812390]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ENDOSCOPIC.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 280.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
280.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/472772
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 44
  • Scopus 130
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 107
  • OpenAlex 137
social impact