Delivery platforms in urban logistics connect providers with customers through distribution riders, who are usually distinguished by low incomes and limited social rights. This paper aims to compare and analyze the freelance and employment models for riders in different European countries in terms of social sustainability, i.e., work motivation and labor rights. To reach this goal, two activities were performed. On the one hand, qualitative interviews with German and Italian riders were carried out. On the other hand, a dynamic metaheuristic algorithm was developed and implemented to simulate an employment model with a central provider that manages order requests in real-time. The qualitative interviews indicate that riders’ motivations differ between freelance riders and employed riders: freelance riders do feel more controlled. Using a quantitative algorithm, this manuscript shows that when an efficient centralized order–rider assignment strategy is applied, a socially sustainable and simultaneously profitable employment model for food delivery businesses is possible. The results have the potential to legitimize adequate rights and salaries for riders while allowing digital platforms to operate profitably. Such win–win situations could support the implementation of platform structures across different logistics sectors and overcome conflicts regarding working rights in such contexts.

Doing Good or Doing Better? Comparing Freelance and Employment Models for a Social Sustainable Food Delivery Sector / Tronconi, Riccardo; Pilati, Francesco. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 2025, 17:19(2025), pp. 1-16. [10.3390/su17198876]

Doing Good or Doing Better? Comparing Freelance and Employment Models for a Social Sustainable Food Delivery Sector

Tronconi, Riccardo;Pilati, Francesco
Ultimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Delivery platforms in urban logistics connect providers with customers through distribution riders, who are usually distinguished by low incomes and limited social rights. This paper aims to compare and analyze the freelance and employment models for riders in different European countries in terms of social sustainability, i.e., work motivation and labor rights. To reach this goal, two activities were performed. On the one hand, qualitative interviews with German and Italian riders were carried out. On the other hand, a dynamic metaheuristic algorithm was developed and implemented to simulate an employment model with a central provider that manages order requests in real-time. The qualitative interviews indicate that riders’ motivations differ between freelance riders and employed riders: freelance riders do feel more controlled. Using a quantitative algorithm, this manuscript shows that when an efficient centralized order–rider assignment strategy is applied, a socially sustainable and simultaneously profitable employment model for food delivery businesses is possible. The results have the potential to legitimize adequate rights and salaries for riders while allowing digital platforms to operate profitably. Such win–win situations could support the implementation of platform structures across different logistics sectors and overcome conflicts regarding working rights in such contexts.
2025
19
Tronconi, Riccardo; Pilati, Francesco
Doing Good or Doing Better? Comparing Freelance and Employment Models for a Social Sustainable Food Delivery Sector / Tronconi, Riccardo; Pilati, Francesco. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 2025, 17:19(2025), pp. 1-16. [10.3390/su17198876]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sustainability-17-08876-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Sustainability 2025, 17, 8876 article
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.28 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.28 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/469418
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact