This article employs a queer theoretical framework to analyse algorithmic discrimination in healthcare-related artificial intelligence, with particular attention to the biases affecting sexual and gender minorities. It offers a comparative analysis of three regulatory models: principle-based; technical-oriented; and sociotechnical-oriented, by examining the European Union Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) Act, the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, and the Brazilian AI Bill. This article argues for a queer-responsive regulatory approach capable of addressing biases embedded in AI systems and promoting more inclusive and equitable healthcare technologies.
Queer-Responsive Regulation for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Comparative Study / Sulmicelli, Sergio. - 48(4):(2025), pp. 1288-1318.
Queer-Responsive Regulation for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Comparative Study
Sulmicelli, Sergio
2025-01-01
Abstract
This article employs a queer theoretical framework to analyse algorithmic discrimination in healthcare-related artificial intelligence, with particular attention to the biases affecting sexual and gender minorities. It offers a comparative analysis of three regulatory models: principle-based; technical-oriented; and sociotechnical-oriented, by examining the European Union Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) Act, the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, and the Brazilian AI Bill. This article argues for a queer-responsive regulatory approach capable of addressing biases embedded in AI systems and promoting more inclusive and equitable healthcare technologies.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



