Objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Despite emerging evidence supporting optimal management, substantial variability persists among non-infectious disease (ID) physicians. This study assessed non-ID physicians’ knowledge and attitudes in BSI management, identifying critical gaps to inform antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. Methods: In December 2024, we conducted an online questionnaire among non-ID physicians at the Provincial Health Care Agency, Trento, Italy. An 18-item questionnaire, developed by a multidisciplinary group, evaluated key domains of BSI management, including diagnostic strategies, antibiotic selection, treatment duration, follow-up management, and ID consultation practices. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse response patterns. Results: Of 128 respondents, 99% expressed willingness to follow internal BSI guidelines, and 94% supported multidisciplinary feedback. Overall, 50.8% correctly identified the optimal 14-day antibiotic duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), and 67.2% selected appropriate treatment for MSSA infections. The prevalence of complicated SAB was underestimated by 51.6% of participants. Follow-up blood cultures and echocardiography were variably recommended (40.6% and 71.9%, respectively, for SAB). 50.8% correctly indicated a 7-day therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSIs, and 49.2% appropriately chose first-line treatments for susceptible Enterobacterales. Familiarity with antibiotic de-escalation (86.7%) and IVto-oral therapy (94.5%) was high, but appropriate application knowledge was inconsistent. Penicillin safety in reported low-risk allergies was recognized by 63.3%, and carbapenems as alternatives by 46.1%. Conclusions: These findings highlights substantial knowledge gaps among non-ID physicians regarding bacterial BSI management. These findings support targeted AMS interventions under the Bacteraemia Evidence-based Active Treatment (BEAT) initiative to improve clinical outcomes.
Bridging the gap in bloodstream infection management: a survey among non-infectious disease physicians / Mori, Giovanni; Zandonà, Emanuela; Campomori, Annalisa; Scarparo, Claudio; Urru, Silvana Annamaria; Stevanin, Gloria; Lorenzin, Giovanni; Ripa, Marco; Castelli, Alessandro; Prezzavento, Alessia; Carli, Alberto; Lombardo, Carla; Lanzafame, Massimiliano. - In: JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE. - ISSN 2632-1823. - 2025/7:5(2025), pp. dlaf1601-dlaf1606. [10.1093/jacamr/dlaf160]
Bridging the gap in bloodstream infection management: a survey among non-infectious disease physicians
Lorenzin, Giovanni;Carli, Alberto;Lanzafame, Massimiliano
2025-01-01
Abstract
Objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Despite emerging evidence supporting optimal management, substantial variability persists among non-infectious disease (ID) physicians. This study assessed non-ID physicians’ knowledge and attitudes in BSI management, identifying critical gaps to inform antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. Methods: In December 2024, we conducted an online questionnaire among non-ID physicians at the Provincial Health Care Agency, Trento, Italy. An 18-item questionnaire, developed by a multidisciplinary group, evaluated key domains of BSI management, including diagnostic strategies, antibiotic selection, treatment duration, follow-up management, and ID consultation practices. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse response patterns. Results: Of 128 respondents, 99% expressed willingness to follow internal BSI guidelines, and 94% supported multidisciplinary feedback. Overall, 50.8% correctly identified the optimal 14-day antibiotic duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), and 67.2% selected appropriate treatment for MSSA infections. The prevalence of complicated SAB was underestimated by 51.6% of participants. Follow-up blood cultures and echocardiography were variably recommended (40.6% and 71.9%, respectively, for SAB). 50.8% correctly indicated a 7-day therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSIs, and 49.2% appropriately chose first-line treatments for susceptible Enterobacterales. Familiarity with antibiotic de-escalation (86.7%) and IVto-oral therapy (94.5%) was high, but appropriate application knowledge was inconsistent. Penicillin safety in reported low-risk allergies was recognized by 63.3%, and carbapenems as alternatives by 46.1%. Conclusions: These findings highlights substantial knowledge gaps among non-ID physicians regarding bacterial BSI management. These findings support targeted AMS interventions under the Bacteraemia Evidence-based Active Treatment (BEAT) initiative to improve clinical outcomes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
JAC Antimicrob Resist 2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
830 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
830 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



