Aims: New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals. Methods: 239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Results: The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing ...

Aims: New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals. Methods: 239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Results: The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing two devices. Multivariate analysis found that male gender and SAP therapy were associated with a higher AP-acceptance overall score (p = 0.045, 0.015, 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: Participants receiving SAP therapy demonstrated higher expectations and optimistic views about AIDs. This treatment modality can act as a trampoline to AIDs despite individuals’ glucose control and diabetes history.

Factors influencing the acceptability of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents / Franceschi, Roberto; Pertile, Riccardo; Marigliano, Marco; Mozzillo, Enza; Maffeis, Claudio; Zaffani, Silvana; Dusini, Carlotta; Antonelli, Annalisa; Maltoni, Giulio; Candia, Francesca Di; Cantarelli, Erika; Minuto, Nicola; Bassi, Marta; Rabbone, Ivana; Savastio, Silvia; Passanisi, Stefano; Lombardo, Fortunato; Cherubini, Valentino; Saltarelli, Maria Alessandra; Tumini, Stefano. - In: DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 0168-8227. - 219:(2025), pp. 1119621-1119626. [10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111962]

Factors influencing the acceptability of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents

Franceschi, Roberto;Pertile, Riccardo;Marigliano, Marco;Maffeis, Claudio;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Aims: New technology has been reported as a factor driving people to choose an automatic insulin delivery system (AIDs) and to sustain its acceptance. We aimed to explore the role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology (instant scanning vs. real-time) and insulin treatment modality to determine the future acceptance of AIDs among T1D individuals. Methods: 239 consecutively enrolled T1D youth and their parents returned the AP questionnaire. All individuals were on CGM, using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Results: The AP-acceptance was more than neutral, with mean overall scores of 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07), youths and parents, respectively. Domains’ analysis revealed high scores in intention to use, usefulness, and trust in AIDs, with favorable expected judgments by others. The items with the highest overall mean scores revealed high glucose control and QoL benefits; the main hassle was the size and discomfort of wearing ...
2025
Franceschi, Roberto; Pertile, Riccardo; Marigliano, Marco; Mozzillo, Enza; Maffeis, Claudio; Zaffani, Silvana; Dusini, Carlotta; Antonelli, Annalisa; ...espandi
Factors influencing the acceptability of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents / Franceschi, Roberto; Pertile, Riccardo; Marigliano, Marco; Mozzillo, Enza; Maffeis, Claudio; Zaffani, Silvana; Dusini, Carlotta; Antonelli, Annalisa; Maltoni, Giulio; Candia, Francesca Di; Cantarelli, Erika; Minuto, Nicola; Bassi, Marta; Rabbone, Ivana; Savastio, Silvia; Passanisi, Stefano; Lombardo, Fortunato; Cherubini, Valentino; Saltarelli, Maria Alessandra; Tumini, Stefano. - In: DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 0168-8227. - 219:(2025), pp. 1119621-1119626. [10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111962]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DRCP AP acceptance 2025.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 505.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
505.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/452453
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact