Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have triggered substantial transformations across various sectors, yielding benefits and rasing concerns. A significant issue pertains to the unequal distribution of AI advantages among different groups, raising questions about diversity and fundamental rights. This paper proposes equity as a translational mechanism intersecting ethical, legal, and technical dimensions in AI governance. By tracing the evolution of AI regulation from corporate ethical guidelines to forthcoming legal frameworks, this paper sheds light on the growing emphasis on auditing mechanisms to mitigate bias and discrimination, distinguishing equity from the more often-used term fairness. While fairness emphasizes fair processes, equity prioritizes equitable outcomes. We argue that equity offers a value that surpasses the limitations of fairness and adopts a holistic viewpoint, providing a comprehensive framework for tackling socio-technical challenges in AI development and...

Equitable AI Audits: evaluating the evaluators in today's world / Munarini, Monique; Brusseau, James; Angeli, Lorenzo. - (2024), pp. 1-8. (Intervento presentato al convegno 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2024 tenutosi a Pretoria, South Africa nel 1st-4th October 2024) [10.1145/3680127.3680140].

Equitable AI Audits: evaluating the evaluators in today's world

Brusseau, James;Angeli, Lorenzo
Ultimo
2024-01-01

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies have triggered substantial transformations across various sectors, yielding benefits and rasing concerns. A significant issue pertains to the unequal distribution of AI advantages among different groups, raising questions about diversity and fundamental rights. This paper proposes equity as a translational mechanism intersecting ethical, legal, and technical dimensions in AI governance. By tracing the evolution of AI regulation from corporate ethical guidelines to forthcoming legal frameworks, this paper sheds light on the growing emphasis on auditing mechanisms to mitigate bias and discrimination, distinguishing equity from the more often-used term fairness. While fairness emphasizes fair processes, equity prioritizes equitable outcomes. We argue that equity offers a value that surpasses the limitations of fairness and adopts a holistic viewpoint, providing a comprehensive framework for tackling socio-technical challenges in AI development and...
2024
ICEGOV '24: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
New York City, NY
Association for Computing Machinery
979-8-4007-1780-2
Munarini, Monique; Brusseau, James; Angeli, Lorenzo
Equitable AI Audits: evaluating the evaluators in today's world / Munarini, Monique; Brusseau, James; Angeli, Lorenzo. - (2024), pp. 1-8. (Intervento presentato al convegno 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2024 tenutosi a Pretoria, South Africa nel 1st-4th October 2024) [10.1145/3680127.3680140].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3680127.3680140.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.76 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.76 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/442890
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
  • OpenAlex 2
social impact