With fast-track authority (FTA), the US Congress delegates trade policy authority to the president by committing not to amend a trade agreement. Why would it cede such power? We suggest an interpretation in which Congress uses FTA to forestall destructive competition between its members for protectionist rents. In our model: (i) FTA is never granted if an industry operates in the majority of districts; (ii) The more symmetric the industrial pattern, the more likely is FTA, since competition for protectionist rents is most punishing when bargaining power is symmetrically distributed; (iii) Widely disparate initial tariffs prevent free trade even with FTA.
When Is It Optimal to Delegate: The Theory of Fast-Track Authority / Celik, Levent; Karabay, Bilgehan; Mclaren, John. - In: AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL: MICROECONOMICS. - ISSN 1945-7669. - 7:3(2015), pp. 347-389. [10.1257/mic.20140031]
When Is It Optimal to Delegate: The Theory of Fast-Track Authority
Karabay, Bilgehan;
2015-01-01
Abstract
With fast-track authority (FTA), the US Congress delegates trade policy authority to the president by committing not to amend a trade agreement. Why would it cede such power? We suggest an interpretation in which Congress uses FTA to forestall destructive competition between its members for protectionist rents. In our model: (i) FTA is never granted if an industry operates in the majority of districts; (ii) The more symmetric the industrial pattern, the more likely is FTA, since competition for protectionist rents is most punishing when bargaining power is symmetrically distributed; (iii) Widely disparate initial tariffs prevent free trade even with FTA.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione