Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing 'boundaries' between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to 'boundary work'. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions / Adem Esmail, Blal; Anderson, Cyrus Carl; Bast, Sigvard; Cortinovis, Chiara; Suleiman, Lina; Kato-Huerta, Jarumi; Högström, Johan; Balfors, Berit; Arciniegas, Gustavo; Geneletti, Davide; Mörtberg, Ulla; Albert, Christian. - In: AMBIO. - ISSN 0044-7447. - 2024:(2024). [10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8]
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions
Adem Esmail, Blal;Cortinovis, Chiara;Kato-Huerta, Jarumi;Geneletti, Davide;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing 'boundaries' between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to 'boundary work'. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione