Background and objective: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) plays a critical role in antimicrobial removal, particularly for low-molecular-weight drugs with low plasma protein binding, low distribution volume and hydrophilicity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes represent a new generation in dialysis technology, enhancing diffusive modality efficacy and increasing the cut-off from 30 to 45 kDa, crucial for middle molecule removal. This monocentric randomized crossover pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of continuous haemodialysis with MCO membrane (MCO-CVVHD) on the removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem compared with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with standard high-flux membrane (HFM-CVVHDF). Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to undergo MCO-CVVHD followed by HFM-CVVHDF or vice versa. Extraction ratio (ER), effluent clearance (Cleff) and treatment efficiency were assessed at various intervals. Antibiotic nadir plasma levels were measured for both treatment days. Results: HFM-CVVHDF showed greater ER compared with MCO-CVVHD for meropenem (β = - 8.90 (95% CI - 12.9 to - 4.87), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 8.29 (95% CI - 13.5 to - 3.08), p = 0.002) and Cleff for each antibiotic (meropenem β = - 10,206 (95% CI - 14,787 to - 5787), p = 0.001); tazobactam (β = - 4551 (95% CI - 7781 to - 1322), p = 0.012); piperacillin (β = - 3913 (95% CI - 6388 to - 1437), p = 0.002), even if the carryover effect influenced the Cleff for meropenem and tazobactam. No difference was observed in nadir plasma concentrations or efficiency for any antibiotic. Piperacillin (β = - 38.1 (95% CI - 47.9 to - 28.3), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 4.45 (95% CI - 6.17 to - 2.72), p < 0.001) showed lower nadir plasma concentrations the second day compared with the first day, regardless the filter type. Conclusion: MCO demonstrated comparable in vivo removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem to HFM.

Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients: Mixed Modality Versus “Expanded Haemodialysis” / Ferrari, Fiorenza; Milla, Paola; Sartori, Marco; Zanza, Christian; Tesauro, Manfredi; Longhitano, Yaroslava; De Silvestri, Annalisa; Abbruzzese, Chiara; De Rosa, Silvia; Lassola, Sergio; Samoni, Sara; Brendolan, Alessandra; Zanella, Monica; Scaravilli, Vittorio; Grasselli, Giacomo; Arpicco, Silvia; Ronco, Claudio. - In: CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS. - ISSN 0312-5963. - 63:8(2024), pp. 1167-1176. [10.1007/s40262-024-01397-w]

Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients: Mixed Modality Versus “Expanded Haemodialysis”

De Rosa, Silvia;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background and objective: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) plays a critical role in antimicrobial removal, particularly for low-molecular-weight drugs with low plasma protein binding, low distribution volume and hydrophilicity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes represent a new generation in dialysis technology, enhancing diffusive modality efficacy and increasing the cut-off from 30 to 45 kDa, crucial for middle molecule removal. This monocentric randomized crossover pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of continuous haemodialysis with MCO membrane (MCO-CVVHD) on the removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem compared with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with standard high-flux membrane (HFM-CVVHDF). Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to undergo MCO-CVVHD followed by HFM-CVVHDF or vice versa. Extraction ratio (ER), effluent clearance (Cleff) and treatment efficiency were assessed at various intervals. Antibiotic nadir plasma levels were measured for both treatment days. Results: HFM-CVVHDF showed greater ER compared with MCO-CVVHD for meropenem (β = - 8.90 (95% CI - 12.9 to - 4.87), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 8.29 (95% CI - 13.5 to - 3.08), p = 0.002) and Cleff for each antibiotic (meropenem β = - 10,206 (95% CI - 14,787 to - 5787), p = 0.001); tazobactam (β = - 4551 (95% CI - 7781 to - 1322), p = 0.012); piperacillin (β = - 3913 (95% CI - 6388 to - 1437), p = 0.002), even if the carryover effect influenced the Cleff for meropenem and tazobactam. No difference was observed in nadir plasma concentrations or efficiency for any antibiotic. Piperacillin (β = - 38.1 (95% CI - 47.9 to - 28.3), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 4.45 (95% CI - 6.17 to - 2.72), p < 0.001) showed lower nadir plasma concentrations the second day compared with the first day, regardless the filter type. Conclusion: MCO demonstrated comparable in vivo removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem to HFM.
2024
8
Ferrari, Fiorenza; Milla, Paola; Sartori, Marco; Zanza, Christian; Tesauro, Manfredi; Longhitano, Yaroslava; De Silvestri, Annalisa; Abbruzzese, Chiar...espandi
Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients: Mixed Modality Versus “Expanded Haemodialysis” / Ferrari, Fiorenza; Milla, Paola; Sartori, Marco; Zanza, Christian; Tesauro, Manfredi; Longhitano, Yaroslava; De Silvestri, Annalisa; Abbruzzese, Chiara; De Rosa, Silvia; Lassola, Sergio; Samoni, Sara; Brendolan, Alessandra; Zanella, Monica; Scaravilli, Vittorio; Grasselli, Giacomo; Arpicco, Silvia; Ronco, Claudio. - In: CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS. - ISSN 0312-5963. - 63:8(2024), pp. 1167-1176. [10.1007/s40262-024-01397-w]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients Mixed Modality Versus Expanded Haemodialysi.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 925.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
925.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/426290
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact