Mentalistic inference, the process of deducing others’ mental states from behaviour, is a key element of social interactions, especially when challenges arise. Just by observing an action or listening to a verbal description of it, adults and infants are able to make robust and rapid inferences about an agent’s intentions, desires, and beliefs. This thesis considers perspectives from Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) and large language models, specifically GPT models. Individuals with ASDs struggle to read intentions from movements, but the mechanisms underlying these difficulties remain unknown. In a set of experiments, we employed combined motion tracking, psychophysics, and computational analyses to examine intention reading in ASDs with single-trial resolution. Single-trial analyses revealed that challenges in intention reading arise from both differences in kinematics between typically developing individuals and those with ASD, and a diminished sensitivity in reading intentions to variations in movement kinematics. This aligns with the idea that internal readout models are tuned to specific action kinematics, supporting the role of sensorimotor processes in shaping cognitive understanding and emphasizing motor resonance, a key aspect of embodied cognition. Targeted trainings may enhance and improve this ability. In a second set of experiments, we compared Theory of Mind, a core feature of mentalistic inference, in GPT models and a large sample of human participants. We found that GPT models exhibited human-level abilities in detecting indirect requests, false beliefs, and misdirection, but failed on faux pas. Rigorous hypothesis testing enabled us to show that this failure was apparent and was linked to a cautious approach in drawing conclusions rather than from an inference deficit. Collectively, the results presented in this thesis suggest that the convergence of insights from clinical research and advancements in technology is essential for fostering a more inclusive understanding of mentalistic inferences.

Decoding Minds: Mentalistic Inference in Autism Spectrum Disorders and ChatGPT Models / Albergo, Dalila. - (2024 Mar 01), pp. 1-161. [10.15168/11572_402850]

Decoding Minds: Mentalistic Inference in Autism Spectrum Disorders and ChatGPT Models

Albergo, Dalila
2024-03-01

Abstract

Mentalistic inference, the process of deducing others’ mental states from behaviour, is a key element of social interactions, especially when challenges arise. Just by observing an action or listening to a verbal description of it, adults and infants are able to make robust and rapid inferences about an agent’s intentions, desires, and beliefs. This thesis considers perspectives from Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) and large language models, specifically GPT models. Individuals with ASDs struggle to read intentions from movements, but the mechanisms underlying these difficulties remain unknown. In a set of experiments, we employed combined motion tracking, psychophysics, and computational analyses to examine intention reading in ASDs with single-trial resolution. Single-trial analyses revealed that challenges in intention reading arise from both differences in kinematics between typically developing individuals and those with ASD, and a diminished sensitivity in reading intentions to variations in movement kinematics. This aligns with the idea that internal readout models are tuned to specific action kinematics, supporting the role of sensorimotor processes in shaping cognitive understanding and emphasizing motor resonance, a key aspect of embodied cognition. Targeted trainings may enhance and improve this ability. In a second set of experiments, we compared Theory of Mind, a core feature of mentalistic inference, in GPT models and a large sample of human participants. We found that GPT models exhibited human-level abilities in detecting indirect requests, false beliefs, and misdirection, but failed on faux pas. Rigorous hypothesis testing enabled us to show that this failure was apparent and was linked to a cautious approach in drawing conclusions rather than from an inference deficit. Collectively, the results presented in this thesis suggest that the convergence of insights from clinical research and advancements in technology is essential for fostering a more inclusive understanding of mentalistic inferences.
1-mar-2024
XXXV
2023-2024
CIMEC (29/10/12-)
Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Panzeri, Stefano Becchio, Cristina
no
Inglese
Settore M-PSI/01 - Psicologia Generale
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
phd_unitn_Dalila_Albergo.pdf

embargo fino al 31/12/2024

Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato (Doctoral Thesis)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.14 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/402850
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact