At the end of a troubled criminal case, the Supreme Court of Cassation recognized the justification of the self defence in favour of some migrants who had opposed the refoulement to the Libyan coast, a place where it was considered that they could run the risk of suffering torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. The three could run the risk of suffering torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. The three judgments through which the case developed offer plenty of food for thought, including judgments through which the case developed offer plenty of food for thought, including the criticalities of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Palermo and the debate othe criticalities of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Palermo and the debate on the n the requirements of the aforementioned justification. requirements of the aforementioned justification.

El caso "Vos Thalassa". El principio de "non refoulement" y el reconocimiento de la legítima defensa de los migrantes en caso de devolución a Libia / Tigrino, Andrea. - In: REVISTA PENAL. - ISSN 1138-9168. - STAMPA. - 2024, 53:(2024), pp. 242-256.

El caso "Vos Thalassa". El principio de "non refoulement" y el reconocimiento de la legítima defensa de los migrantes en caso de devolución a Libia

Tigrino, Andrea
2024-01-01

Abstract

At the end of a troubled criminal case, the Supreme Court of Cassation recognized the justification of the self defence in favour of some migrants who had opposed the refoulement to the Libyan coast, a place where it was considered that they could run the risk of suffering torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. The three could run the risk of suffering torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. The three judgments through which the case developed offer plenty of food for thought, including judgments through which the case developed offer plenty of food for thought, including the criticalities of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Palermo and the debate othe criticalities of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Palermo and the debate on the n the requirements of the aforementioned justification. requirements of the aforementioned justification.
2024
Tigrino, Andrea
El caso "Vos Thalassa". El principio de "non refoulement" y el reconocimiento de la legítima defensa de los migrantes en caso de devolución a Libia / Tigrino, Andrea. - In: REVISTA PENAL. - ISSN 1138-9168. - STAMPA. - 2024, 53:(2024), pp. 242-256.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tigrino - Revista Penal (n. 53 - Enero 2024)-.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 7.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.21 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/402749
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact