THE RESIDENCE AS REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO ACCESS TO THE RIGHT TO STUDY: THE JUDGMENT N. 42/2021 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. The judgment no. 42 of 2021 of the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of a provision of a law of the Autonomous Province of Trento. The rule declared unconstitutional provided that the Province could promote the inclusion of a reserve of places for university enrollment in favor of candidates residing in the Province of Trento. In a few, but convincing, arguments, the Constitutional Judge affirmed that the contested provision objectively affected the effectiveness of the access to the right to university education, introducing an unreasonable, illegitimate and disproportionate selection criterion. More specifically, the favor was deemed insufficient for it to justify the sacrifice imposed on the principle of legal equality between citizens.
Il requisito della residenza in rapporto all’accesso al diritto allo studio: la sent. n. 42/2021 della Corte costituzionale / Desantis, Vincenzo. - In: LE REGIONI. - ISSN 0391-7576. - STAMPA. - 2021:4(2021), pp. 923-940. [10.1443/103538]
Il requisito della residenza in rapporto all’accesso al diritto allo studio: la sent. n. 42/2021 della Corte costituzionale
Desantis, Vincenzo
2021-01-01
Abstract
THE RESIDENCE AS REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO ACCESS TO THE RIGHT TO STUDY: THE JUDGMENT N. 42/2021 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT. The judgment no. 42 of 2021 of the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of a provision of a law of the Autonomous Province of Trento. The rule declared unconstitutional provided that the Province could promote the inclusion of a reserve of places for university enrollment in favor of candidates residing in the Province of Trento. In a few, but convincing, arguments, the Constitutional Judge affirmed that the contested provision objectively affected the effectiveness of the access to the right to university education, introducing an unreasonable, illegitimate and disproportionate selection criterion. More specifically, the favor was deemed insufficient for it to justify the sacrifice imposed on the principle of legal equality between citizens.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
0391-7576-29676-35.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



