he essay explores the use of artificial intelligence as a tool for content mod- eration by social media platforms and how it poses risks to the freedom of expression of LGBTQ+ individuals, perpetuating online the marginalization experienced by queer individuals offline. The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) regulation attempts to address this issue by balancing the need for content moderation with safeguards to freedom of expression. However, in order to mitigate the risks to the queer community’s free- dom of expression, a regulatory approach must include transparency obligations on platforms that use algorithmic content moderation, but also avoid incentivizing social media to adopt a more aggressive and generalized moderation approach to elude the risk of being sanctioned, generating the so-called ‘better safe than sorry’ effect.
Algorithmic content moderation and the LGBTQ+ community’s freedom of expression on social media: insights from the EU Digital Services Act / Sulmicelli, Sergio. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - 2023:2(2023), pp. 471-489. [10.15168/2284-4503-2717]
Algorithmic content moderation and the LGBTQ+ community’s freedom of expression on social media: insights from the EU Digital Services Act
Sulmicelli, Sergio
2023-01-01
Abstract
he essay explores the use of artificial intelligence as a tool for content mod- eration by social media platforms and how it poses risks to the freedom of expression of LGBTQ+ individuals, perpetuating online the marginalization experienced by queer individuals offline. The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) regulation attempts to address this issue by balancing the need for content moderation with safeguards to freedom of expression. However, in order to mitigate the risks to the queer community’s free- dom of expression, a regulatory approach must include transparency obligations on platforms that use algorithmic content moderation, but also avoid incentivizing social media to adopt a more aggressive and generalized moderation approach to elude the risk of being sanctioned, generating the so-called ‘better safe than sorry’ effect.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
document.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
432.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
432.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione