: Human intentional communication is marked by its flexibility and context sensitivity. Hypothesized brain mechanisms can provide convincing and complete explanations of the human capacity for intentional communication only insofar as they can match the computational power required for displaying that capacity. It is thus of importance for cognitive neuroscience to know how computationally complex intentional communication actually is. Though the subject of considerable debate, the computational complexity of communication remains so far unknown. In this paper we defend the position that the computational complexity of communication is not a constant, as some views of communication seem to hold, but rather a function of situational factors. We present a methodology for studying and characterizing the computational complexity of communication under different situational constraints. We illustrate our methodology for a model of the problems solved by receivers and senders during a communicative exchange. This approach opens the way to a principled identification of putative model parameters that control cognitive processes supporting intentional communication.

Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult? / van Rooij, Iris; Kwisthout, Johan; Blokpoel, Mark; Szymanik, Jakub; Wareham, Todd; Toni, Ivan. - In: FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE. - ISSN 1662-5161. - 5:(2011), p. 52. [10.3389/fnhum.2011.00052]

Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?

Szymanik, Jakub;
2011-01-01

Abstract

: Human intentional communication is marked by its flexibility and context sensitivity. Hypothesized brain mechanisms can provide convincing and complete explanations of the human capacity for intentional communication only insofar as they can match the computational power required for displaying that capacity. It is thus of importance for cognitive neuroscience to know how computationally complex intentional communication actually is. Though the subject of considerable debate, the computational complexity of communication remains so far unknown. In this paper we defend the position that the computational complexity of communication is not a constant, as some views of communication seem to hold, but rather a function of situational factors. We present a methodology for studying and characterizing the computational complexity of communication under different situational constraints. We illustrate our methodology for a model of the problems solved by receivers and senders during a communicative exchange. This approach opens the way to a principled identification of putative model parameters that control cognitive processes supporting intentional communication.
2011
van Rooij, Iris; Kwisthout, Johan; Blokpoel, Mark; Szymanik, Jakub; Wareham, Todd; Toni, Ivan
Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult? / van Rooij, Iris; Kwisthout, Johan; Blokpoel, Mark; Szymanik, Jakub; Wareham, Todd; Toni, Ivan. - In: FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE. - ISSN 1662-5161. - 5:(2011), p. 52. [10.3389/fnhum.2011.00052]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/364372
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact