BACKGROUND: Social distancing have been widely used to mitigate community spread of SARS-CoV-2. We sought to quantify the impact of COVID-19 social distancing policies across 27 European counties in spring 2020 on population mobility and the subsequent trajectory of disease. METHODS: We obtained data on national social distancing policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and aggregated and anonymized mobility data from Google. We used a pre-post comparison and two linear mixed-effects models to first assess the relationship between implementation of national policies and observed changes in mobility, and then to assess the relationship between changes in mobility and rates of COVID-19 infections in subsequent weeks. RESULTS: Compared to a pre-COVID baseline, Spain saw the largest decrease in aggregate population mobility (~70%), as measured by the time spent away from residence, while Sweden saw the smallest decrease (~20%). The largest declines in mobility were associated with mandatory stay-at-home orders, followed by mandatory workplace closures, school closures, and non-mandatory workplace closures. While mandatory shelter-in-place orders were associated with 16.7% less mobility (95% CI: -23.7% to -9.7%), non-mandatory orders were only associated with an 8.4% decrease (95% CI: -14.9% to -1.8%). Large-gathering bans were associated with the smallest change in mobility compared with other policy types. Changes in mobility were in turn associated with changes in COVID-19 case growth. For example, a 10% decrease in time spent away from places of residence was associated with 11.8% (95% CI: 3.8%, 19.1%) fewer new COVID-19 cases. DISCUSSION: This comprehensive evaluation across Europe suggests that mandatory stay-at-home orders and workplace closures had the largest impacts on population mobility and subsequent COVID-19 cases at the onset of the pandemic. With a better understanding of policies’ relative performance, countries can more effectively invest in, and target, early nonpharmacological interventions.

Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020 / Woskie, Liana R.; Hennessy, Jonathan; Espinosa, Valeria; Tsai, Thomas C.; Vispute, Swapnil; Jacobson, Benjamin H.; Cattuto, Ciro; Gauvin, Laetitia; Tizzoni, Michele; Fabrikant, Alex; Gadepalli, Krishna; Boulanger, Adam; Pearce, Adam; Kamath, Chaitanya; Schlosberg, Arran; Stanton, Charlotte; Bavadekar, Shailesh; Abueg, Matthew; Hogue, Michael; Oplinger, Andrew; Chou, Katherine; Corrado, Greg; Shekel, Tomer; Jha, Ashish K.; Wellenius, Gregory A.; Gabrilovich, Evge. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:6(2021), pp. e0253071.1-e0253071.12. [10.1371/journal.pone.0253071]

Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020

Tizzoni, Michele;
2021-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social distancing have been widely used to mitigate community spread of SARS-CoV-2. We sought to quantify the impact of COVID-19 social distancing policies across 27 European counties in spring 2020 on population mobility and the subsequent trajectory of disease. METHODS: We obtained data on national social distancing policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and aggregated and anonymized mobility data from Google. We used a pre-post comparison and two linear mixed-effects models to first assess the relationship between implementation of national policies and observed changes in mobility, and then to assess the relationship between changes in mobility and rates of COVID-19 infections in subsequent weeks. RESULTS: Compared to a pre-COVID baseline, Spain saw the largest decrease in aggregate population mobility (~70%), as measured by the time spent away from residence, while Sweden saw the smallest decrease (~20%). The largest declines in mobility were associated with mandatory stay-at-home orders, followed by mandatory workplace closures, school closures, and non-mandatory workplace closures. While mandatory shelter-in-place orders were associated with 16.7% less mobility (95% CI: -23.7% to -9.7%), non-mandatory orders were only associated with an 8.4% decrease (95% CI: -14.9% to -1.8%). Large-gathering bans were associated with the smallest change in mobility compared with other policy types. Changes in mobility were in turn associated with changes in COVID-19 case growth. For example, a 10% decrease in time spent away from places of residence was associated with 11.8% (95% CI: 3.8%, 19.1%) fewer new COVID-19 cases. DISCUSSION: This comprehensive evaluation across Europe suggests that mandatory stay-at-home orders and workplace closures had the largest impacts on population mobility and subsequent COVID-19 cases at the onset of the pandemic. With a better understanding of policies’ relative performance, countries can more effectively invest in, and target, early nonpharmacological interventions.
2021
6
Woskie, Liana R.; Hennessy, Jonathan; Espinosa, Valeria; Tsai, Thomas C.; Vispute, Swapnil; Jacobson, Benjamin H.; Cattuto, Ciro; Gauvin, Laetitia; Tizzoni, Michele; Fabrikant, Alex; Gadepalli, Krishna; Boulanger, Adam; Pearce, Adam; Kamath, Chaitanya; Schlosberg, Arran; Stanton, Charlotte; Bavadekar, Shailesh; Abueg, Matthew; Hogue, Michael; Oplinger, Andrew; Chou, Katherine; Corrado, Greg; Shekel, Tomer; Jha, Ashish K.; Wellenius, Gregory A.; Gabrilovich, Evge
Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020 / Woskie, Liana R.; Hennessy, Jonathan; Espinosa, Valeria; Tsai, Thomas C.; Vispute, Swapnil; Jacobson, Benjamin H.; Cattuto, Ciro; Gauvin, Laetitia; Tizzoni, Michele; Fabrikant, Alex; Gadepalli, Krishna; Boulanger, Adam; Pearce, Adam; Kamath, Chaitanya; Schlosberg, Arran; Stanton, Charlotte; Bavadekar, Shailesh; Abueg, Matthew; Hogue, Michael; Oplinger, Andrew; Chou, Katherine; Corrado, Greg; Shekel, Tomer; Jha, Ashish K.; Wellenius, Gregory A.; Gabrilovich, Evge. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 16:6(2021), pp. e0253071.1-e0253071.12. [10.1371/journal.pone.0253071]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
journal.pone.0253071 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/362266
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact