Cultural evolution studies are characterized by the notion that culture evolves accordingly to broadly Darwinian principles. Yet how far the analogy between cultural and genetic evolution should be pushed is open to debate. Here, we examine a recent disagreement that concerns the extent to which cultural transmission should be considered a preservative mechanism allowing selection among different variants, or a transformative process in which individuals recreate variants each time they are transmitted. The latter is associated with the notion of "cultural attraction". This issue has generated much misunderstanding and confusion. We first clarify the respective positions, noting that there is in fact no substantive incompatibility between cultural attraction and standard cultural evolution approaches, beyond a difference in focus. Whether cultural transmission should be considered a preservative or reconstructive process is ultimately an empirical question, and we examine how both preservative and reconstructive cultural transmission has been studied in recent experimental research in cultural evolution. Finally, we discuss how the relative importance of preservative and reconstructive processes may depend on the granularity of analysis and the domain being studied.

If we are all cultural Darwinians what's the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution / Acerbi, Alberto; Mesoudi, Alex. - In: BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY. - ISSN 0169-3867. - 30:(2015), pp. 481-503. [10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2]

If we are all cultural Darwinians what's the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution

Acerbi, Alberto
Primo
;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Cultural evolution studies are characterized by the notion that culture evolves accordingly to broadly Darwinian principles. Yet how far the analogy between cultural and genetic evolution should be pushed is open to debate. Here, we examine a recent disagreement that concerns the extent to which cultural transmission should be considered a preservative mechanism allowing selection among different variants, or a transformative process in which individuals recreate variants each time they are transmitted. The latter is associated with the notion of "cultural attraction". This issue has generated much misunderstanding and confusion. We first clarify the respective positions, noting that there is in fact no substantive incompatibility between cultural attraction and standard cultural evolution approaches, beyond a difference in focus. Whether cultural transmission should be considered a preservative or reconstructive process is ultimately an empirical question, and we examine how both preservative and reconstructive cultural transmission has been studied in recent experimental research in cultural evolution. Finally, we discuss how the relative importance of preservative and reconstructive processes may depend on the granularity of analysis and the domain being studied.
2015
Acerbi, Alberto; Mesoudi, Alex
If we are all cultural Darwinians what's the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution / Acerbi, Alberto; Mesoudi, Alex. - In: BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY. - ISSN 0169-3867. - 30:(2015), pp. 481-503. [10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015_phil_bio.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 509.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
509.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/359775
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 101
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 89
social impact