There is increasing interest in the use of economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services for a wide variety of purposes. These include relatively familiar uses in project appraisal and more novel applications in advocacy, performance tracking and accounting in public and private settings. Decision makers who use valuation information need to understand the background, strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. The methods have a strong foundation in economic theory and offer a rapidly growing evidence base, improving ability to evaluate a broad range of ecosystem goods and services. Nevertheless, there are theoretical and practical limitations that need to be understood and kept in mind when interpreting results. In this paper, we briefly review the economic valuation methods and situate them in their historical and theoretical contexts. We assess the main critiques, attempts at resolving them, and implications for the usefulness of the methods in different contexts. We examine the main barriers and opportunities for wider uses of valuation evidence, and draw conclusions on the appropriate role of valuation in future, as a tool for aiding reflection and deliberation processes.

Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: a review for decision makers / Tinch, R.; Beaumont, N.; Sunderland, T.; Ozdemiroglu, E.; Barton, D.; Bowe, C.; Borger, T.; Burgess, P.; Cooper, C. N.; Faccioli, M.; Failler, P.; Gkolemi, I.; Kumar, R.; Longo, A.; Mcvittie, A.; Morris, J.; Park, J.; Ravenscroft, N.; Schaafsma, M.; Vause, J.; Ziv, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY. - ISSN 2160-6544. - 8:4(2019), pp. 359-378. [10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083]

Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: a review for decision makers

Faccioli M.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services for a wide variety of purposes. These include relatively familiar uses in project appraisal and more novel applications in advocacy, performance tracking and accounting in public and private settings. Decision makers who use valuation information need to understand the background, strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. The methods have a strong foundation in economic theory and offer a rapidly growing evidence base, improving ability to evaluate a broad range of ecosystem goods and services. Nevertheless, there are theoretical and practical limitations that need to be understood and kept in mind when interpreting results. In this paper, we briefly review the economic valuation methods and situate them in their historical and theoretical contexts. We assess the main critiques, attempts at resolving them, and implications for the usefulness of the methods in different contexts. We examine the main barriers and opportunities for wider uses of valuation evidence, and draw conclusions on the appropriate role of valuation in future, as a tool for aiding reflection and deliberation processes.
2019
4
Tinch, R.; Beaumont, N.; Sunderland, T.; Ozdemiroglu, E.; Barton, D.; Bowe, C.; Borger, T.; Burgess, P.; Cooper, C. N.; Faccioli, M.; Failler, P.; Gko...espandi
Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: a review for decision makers / Tinch, R.; Beaumont, N.; Sunderland, T.; Ozdemiroglu, E.; Barton, D.; Bowe, C.; Borger, T.; Burgess, P.; Cooper, C. N.; Faccioli, M.; Failler, P.; Gkolemi, I.; Kumar, R.; Longo, A.; Mcvittie, A.; Morris, J.; Park, J.; Ravenscroft, N.; Schaafsma, M.; Vause, J.; Ziv, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY. - ISSN 2160-6544. - 8:4(2019), pp. 359-378. [10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/354748
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact