Spouted beds are commonly simulated through the Computational Fluid Dynamics – Discrete Element Method approach. The choice of the drag model is still a matter of debate, as they feature peculiar operative conditions. In this work, we simulated two spouted beds containing Geldart-D particles. We tested seven drag models: three are classic models, while four are developed through advanced computational techniques. The results indicate that the key variable is the ratio between the operative and the minimum spouting gas velocity (u/ums). At u = ums only the Gidaspow model can always predict fluidisation, but at low u/ums values the Beetstra model is the best compromise. For higher values, the Rong and Di Felice models behave better, while the others overestimate the particles' velocity. These results can be useful to identify the best performing model and show there is a need for more appropriate models for spouted beds.

Comparison of Different Drag Models in CFD-DEM Simulations of Spouted Beds / Marchelli, F.; Hou, Q.; Bosio, B.; Arato, E.; Yu, A.. - In: POWDER TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0032-5910. - STAMPA. - 360:(2020), pp. 1253-1270. [10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.058]

Comparison of Different Drag Models in CFD-DEM Simulations of Spouted Beds

Marchelli F.;Bosio B.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Spouted beds are commonly simulated through the Computational Fluid Dynamics – Discrete Element Method approach. The choice of the drag model is still a matter of debate, as they feature peculiar operative conditions. In this work, we simulated two spouted beds containing Geldart-D particles. We tested seven drag models: three are classic models, while four are developed through advanced computational techniques. The results indicate that the key variable is the ratio between the operative and the minimum spouting gas velocity (u/ums). At u = ums only the Gidaspow model can always predict fluidisation, but at low u/ums values the Beetstra model is the best compromise. For higher values, the Rong and Di Felice models behave better, while the others overestimate the particles' velocity. These results can be useful to identify the best performing model and show there is a need for more appropriate models for spouted beds.
2020
Marchelli, F.; Hou, Q.; Bosio, B.; Arato, E.; Yu, A.
Comparison of Different Drag Models in CFD-DEM Simulations of Spouted Beds / Marchelli, F.; Hou, Q.; Bosio, B.; Arato, E.; Yu, A.. - In: POWDER TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0032-5910. - STAMPA. - 360:(2020), pp. 1253-1270. [10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.058]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
comparison of different drag models in cfd-dem simulations of spouted beds_2020.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 5.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.49 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/332432
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact