Interventions to improve working memory, e.g. by combining task rehearsal and non-invasive brain stimulation, are gaining popularity. Many factors, however, affect the outcome of these interventions. We hypothesize that working memory capacity at baseline predicts how an individual performs on a working memory task, by setting limits on the benefit derived from tDCS when combined with strategy instructions; specifically, we hypothesize that individuals with low capacity will benefit the most. Eighty-four participants underwent two sessions of an adaptive working memory task (n-back) on two consecutive days. Participants were split into four independent groups (SHAM vs ACTIVE stimulation and STRATEGY vs no STRATEGY instructions). For the purpose of analysis, individuals were divided based on their baseline working memory capacity. Results support our prediction that the combination of tDCS and strategy instructions is particularly beneficial in low capacity individuals. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting the outcome of tDCS when used in conjunction with cognitive training to improve working memory. Moreover, our results have implications for training regimens, e.g., by designing interventions predicated on baseline cognitive abilities, or focusing on strategy development for specific attentional skills.

Impact of tDCS on working memory training is enhanced by strategy instructions in individuals with low working memory capacity / Assecondi, Sara; Hu, Rong; Eskes, Gail; Pan, Xiaoping; Zhou, Jin; Shapiro, Kim. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:1(2021), p. 5531. [10.1038/s41598-021-84298-3]

Impact of tDCS on working memory training is enhanced by strategy instructions in individuals with low working memory capacity

Assecondi, Sara;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Interventions to improve working memory, e.g. by combining task rehearsal and non-invasive brain stimulation, are gaining popularity. Many factors, however, affect the outcome of these interventions. We hypothesize that working memory capacity at baseline predicts how an individual performs on a working memory task, by setting limits on the benefit derived from tDCS when combined with strategy instructions; specifically, we hypothesize that individuals with low capacity will benefit the most. Eighty-four participants underwent two sessions of an adaptive working memory task (n-back) on two consecutive days. Participants were split into four independent groups (SHAM vs ACTIVE stimulation and STRATEGY vs no STRATEGY instructions). For the purpose of analysis, individuals were divided based on their baseline working memory capacity. Results support our prediction that the combination of tDCS and strategy instructions is particularly beneficial in low capacity individuals. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting the outcome of tDCS when used in conjunction with cognitive training to improve working memory. Moreover, our results have implications for training regimens, e.g., by designing interventions predicated on baseline cognitive abilities, or focusing on strategy development for specific attentional skills.
2021
1
Assecondi, Sara; Hu, Rong; Eskes, Gail; Pan, Xiaoping; Zhou, Jin; Shapiro, Kim
Impact of tDCS on working memory training is enhanced by strategy instructions in individuals with low working memory capacity / Assecondi, Sara; Hu, Rong; Eskes, Gail; Pan, Xiaoping; Zhou, Jin; Shapiro, Kim. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:1(2021), p. 5531. [10.1038/s41598-021-84298-3]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-021-84298-3.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/331672
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact