People tend to take more risks when deciding for others than for themselves. Results of three laboratory experiments (N = 398) suggest that this also applies to risk management decisions that protect from low-probability, high-consequence events, such as natural disasters. Participants bought a risk insurance contract and a building-strengthening intervention less frequently when they decided for another than when they decided for themselves in a game simulating a seismic risk. This self-other effect was strong when the probability of a disaster was low (4%), and the potential damage was high (a 50% reduction in value); however, it disappeared when the probability was higher (20%) and the potential damage lower (a 10% reduction in value) despite identical expected value. These results support the importance of the size of the potential damage in the triggering of the self-other effect. Our findings have practical implications in cases where risk management is under the control of a decision-maker, such as a manager or government, different from the final recipient. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association

Self-other decision making and protective behavior under risk / Savadori, Lucia; L., and Speranza. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, PSYCHOLOGY, AND ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1937-321X. - 2021:(2021). [10.1037/npe0000139]

Self-other decision making and protective behavior under risk

Savadori;
2021-01-01

Abstract

People tend to take more risks when deciding for others than for themselves. Results of three laboratory experiments (N = 398) suggest that this also applies to risk management decisions that protect from low-probability, high-consequence events, such as natural disasters. Participants bought a risk insurance contract and a building-strengthening intervention less frequently when they decided for another than when they decided for themselves in a game simulating a seismic risk. This self-other effect was strong when the probability of a disaster was low (4%), and the potential damage was high (a 50% reduction in value); however, it disappeared when the probability was higher (20%) and the potential damage lower (a 10% reduction in value) despite identical expected value. These results support the importance of the size of the potential damage in the triggering of the self-other effect. Our findings have practical implications in cases where risk management is under the control of a decision-maker, such as a manager or government, different from the final recipient. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) © 2021 American Psychological Association
2021
Savadori, Lucia; L., and Speranza
Self-other decision making and protective behavior under risk / Savadori, Lucia; L., and Speranza. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, PSYCHOLOGY, AND ECONOMICS. - ISSN 1937-321X. - 2021:(2021). [10.1037/npe0000139]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
salvadori.self.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 853.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
853.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/327348
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact