Although brain size and the concept of intelligence have been extensively used in comparative neuroscience to study cognition and its evolution, such coarse-grained traits may not be informative enough about important aspects of neurocognitive systems. By taking into account the different evolutionary trajectories and the selection pressures on neurophysiology across species, Logan and colleagues suggest that the cognitive abilities of an organism should be investigated by considering the fine-grained and species-specific phenotypic traits that characterize it. In such a way, we would avoid adopting human-oriented, coarse-grained traits, typical of the standard approach in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that this standard approach can fail in some cases, but can, however, work in others, by discussing two major topics in contemporary neuroscience as examples: general intelligence and brain asymmetries.

Where the standard approach in comparative neuroscience fails and where it works: General intelligence and brain asymmetries / Serpico, D.; Frasnelli, E.. - In: COMPARATIVE COGNITION & BEHAVIOR REVIEWS. - ISSN 1911-4745. - 13:(2018), pp. 95-98. [10.3819/CCBR.2018.130010]

Where the standard approach in comparative neuroscience fails and where it works: General intelligence and brain asymmetries

Frasnelli E.
2018-01-01

Abstract

Although brain size and the concept of intelligence have been extensively used in comparative neuroscience to study cognition and its evolution, such coarse-grained traits may not be informative enough about important aspects of neurocognitive systems. By taking into account the different evolutionary trajectories and the selection pressures on neurophysiology across species, Logan and colleagues suggest that the cognitive abilities of an organism should be investigated by considering the fine-grained and species-specific phenotypic traits that characterize it. In such a way, we would avoid adopting human-oriented, coarse-grained traits, typical of the standard approach in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that this standard approach can fail in some cases, but can, however, work in others, by discussing two major topics in contemporary neuroscience as examples: general intelligence and brain asymmetries.
2018
Serpico, D.; Frasnelli, E.
Where the standard approach in comparative neuroscience fails and where it works: General intelligence and brain asymmetries / Serpico, D.; Frasnelli, E.. - In: COMPARATIVE COGNITION & BEHAVIOR REVIEWS. - ISSN 1911-4745. - 13:(2018), pp. 95-98. [10.3819/CCBR.2018.130010]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Serpico & Frasnelli_CCBR_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 91.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
91.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/323326
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact