In this short commentary, I discuss Olof Hallonsten’s argument against science evaluation. My invitation is to place the discussion in a wider frame that takes into account the many challenges scientists and scientific institutions face today. I argue in favor of a ‘start from the middle’ approach that gives emphasis to the inner principle of valorization of the scientific endeavor.
Science evaluation – As it is, as it could be / Brighenti, Andrea. - In: SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION. - ISSN 0539-0184. - 60:3(2021), pp. 324-328. [10.1177/05390184211021205]
Science evaluation – As it is, as it could be
Brighenti, Andrea
2021-01-01
Abstract
In this short commentary, I discuss Olof Hallonsten’s argument against science evaluation. My invitation is to place the discussion in a wider frame that takes into account the many challenges scientists and scientific institutions face today. I argue in favor of a ‘start from the middle’ approach that gives emphasis to the inner principle of valorization of the scientific endeavor.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Brighenti 2021 Science Evaluation.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
104.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
104.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione