In this short commentary, I discuss Olof Hallonsten’s argument against science evaluation. My invitation is to place the discussion in a wider frame that takes into account the many challenges scientists and scientific institutions face today. I argue in favor of a ‘start from the middle’ approach that gives emphasis to the inner principle of valorization of the scientific endeavor.

Science evaluation – As it is, as it could be / Brighenti, Andrea. - In: SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION. - ISSN 0539-0184. - 60:3(2021), pp. 324-328. [10.1177/05390184211021205]

Science evaluation – As it is, as it could be

Brighenti, Andrea
2021-01-01

Abstract

In this short commentary, I discuss Olof Hallonsten’s argument against science evaluation. My invitation is to place the discussion in a wider frame that takes into account the many challenges scientists and scientific institutions face today. I argue in favor of a ‘start from the middle’ approach that gives emphasis to the inner principle of valorization of the scientific endeavor.
2021
3
Brighenti, Andrea
Science evaluation – As it is, as it could be / Brighenti, Andrea. - In: SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION. - ISSN 0539-0184. - 60:3(2021), pp. 324-328. [10.1177/05390184211021205]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Brighenti 2021 Science Evaluation.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 104.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
104.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/321868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact