Zebrafish spontaneously use distance and directional relationships among three-dimensional extended surfaces to reorient within a rectangular arena. However, they fail to take advantage of either an array of freestanding corners or an array of unequal-length surfaces to search for a no-longer-present goal under a spontaneous cued memory procedure, being unable to use the information supplied by corners and length without some kind of rewarded training. The present study aimed to tease apart the geometric components characterizing a rectangular enclosure under a procedure recruiting the reference memory, thus training zebrafish in fragmented layouts that provided differences in surface distance, corners, and length. Results showed that fish, besides the distance, easily learned to use both corners and length if subjected to a rewarded exit task over time, suggesting that they can represent all the geometrically informative parts of a rectangular arena when consistently exposed to them. Altogether, these findings highlight crucially important issues apropos the employment of different behavioral protocols (spontaneous choice versus training over time) to assess spatial abilities of zebrafish, further paving the way to deepen the role of visual and nonvisual encodings of isolated geometric components in relation to macrostructural boundaries.

Learning by doing: The use of distance, corners and length in rewarded geometric tasks by Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) / Baratti, Greta; Rizzo, Angelo; Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena; Sovrano, Valeria Anna. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:7(2021), pp. 2001.1-2001.18. [10.3390/ani11072001]

Learning by doing: The use of distance, corners and length in rewarded geometric tasks by Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)

Baratti, Greta;Sovrano, Valeria Anna
2021-01-01

Abstract

Zebrafish spontaneously use distance and directional relationships among three-dimensional extended surfaces to reorient within a rectangular arena. However, they fail to take advantage of either an array of freestanding corners or an array of unequal-length surfaces to search for a no-longer-present goal under a spontaneous cued memory procedure, being unable to use the information supplied by corners and length without some kind of rewarded training. The present study aimed to tease apart the geometric components characterizing a rectangular enclosure under a procedure recruiting the reference memory, thus training zebrafish in fragmented layouts that provided differences in surface distance, corners, and length. Results showed that fish, besides the distance, easily learned to use both corners and length if subjected to a rewarded exit task over time, suggesting that they can represent all the geometrically informative parts of a rectangular arena when consistently exposed to them. Altogether, these findings highlight crucially important issues apropos the employment of different behavioral protocols (spontaneous choice versus training over time) to assess spatial abilities of zebrafish, further paving the way to deepen the role of visual and nonvisual encodings of isolated geometric components in relation to macrostructural boundaries.
2021
7
Baratti, Greta; Rizzo, Angelo; Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena; Sovrano, Valeria Anna
Learning by doing: The use of distance, corners and length in rewarded geometric tasks by Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) / Baratti, Greta; Rizzo, Angelo; Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena; Sovrano, Valeria Anna. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - ELETTRONICO. - 11:7(2021), pp. 2001.1-2001.18. [10.3390/ani11072001]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Baratti et al,2021_Learning by doing_geometry_animals.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/316938
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact