This work investigates Hegel's objections to J.K. Lavater's physiognomic theory and F.J. Gall's organology as cause for reflection on the reductionist and deterministic outcomes of some contemporary neuroscientists and philosophers of the mind that believe "we are our body" and, in particular, our brain. According to the philosopher, physiognomy and craniology represent the extreme outcome of the so-called observational method, which fails to understand the psychic complexity of the subject and does not give a full account of free will. Even though Hegel always put in relation his theory of mind with the empirical data of the natural sciences, his remarks on this subject may assume a theoretical relevance for the contemporary debate in terms of highlighting that experimental data on brain functioning, although essential, do not fully account for the structure of subjectivity as an activity of self-determination.
Regioni del corpo o ragioni dello spirito? L’attualità della critica hegeliana alla fisiognomica e alla craniologia / Maurer, Caterina. - In: TEORIA. - ISSN 1122-1259. - 41:1(2021), pp. 71-90. [10.4454/teoria.v41i1.120]
Regioni del corpo o ragioni dello spirito? L’attualità della critica hegeliana alla fisiognomica e alla craniologia
Maurer, Caterina
2021-01-01
Abstract
This work investigates Hegel's objections to J.K. Lavater's physiognomic theory and F.J. Gall's organology as cause for reflection on the reductionist and deterministic outcomes of some contemporary neuroscientists and philosophers of the mind that believe "we are our body" and, in particular, our brain. According to the philosopher, physiognomy and craniology represent the extreme outcome of the so-called observational method, which fails to understand the psychic complexity of the subject and does not give a full account of free will. Even though Hegel always put in relation his theory of mind with the empirical data of the natural sciences, his remarks on this subject may assume a theoretical relevance for the contemporary debate in terms of highlighting that experimental data on brain functioning, although essential, do not fully account for the structure of subjectivity as an activity of self-determination.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione