In the present study we analyzed the processing of grammatically anomalous sentences like “∗The famous dancerwerenervously preparingherself/themselvesto face the crowd. ”, which contains two anomalies, one early and one late. We investigated how processing of the later anomaly (at the pronoun ‘herself ’ or ‘themselves ’) was affected by the processing of the early anomaly (at ‘were ’). We considered two processing scenarios involving the first anomaly: (1) The representation of the subject–verb number agreement error at the first verb is coerced to match the verb, rendering ‘herself ’ anomalous; (2) The representation of the subject–verb agreement error is coerced to match the subject noun, rendering ‘themselves ’ anomalous. Our dependent measure was event-related scalp potentials (ERPs). When the pronoun disagreed with the verb (and agreed with the subject), a P600 was recorded, while the opposite condition elicited no reliable effect. Our data suggest that interpretation of reflexive pronouns involves the reactivation of multiple lexical items, verbs included.

Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation / N., Molinaro; A., Kim; Vespignani, Francesco; Job, Remo. - In: COGNITION. - ISSN 0010-0277. - STAMPA. - 106:2(2008), pp. 963-974. [10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.006]

Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation

Vespignani, Francesco;Job, Remo
2008

Abstract

In the present study we analyzed the processing of grammatically anomalous sentences like “∗The famous dancerwerenervously preparingherself/themselvesto face the crowd. ”, which contains two anomalies, one early and one late. We investigated how processing of the later anomaly (at the pronoun ‘herself ’ or ‘themselves ’) was affected by the processing of the early anomaly (at ‘were ’). We considered two processing scenarios involving the first anomaly: (1) The representation of the subject–verb number agreement error at the first verb is coerced to match the verb, rendering ‘herself ’ anomalous; (2) The representation of the subject–verb agreement error is coerced to match the subject noun, rendering ‘themselves ’ anomalous. Our dependent measure was event-related scalp potentials (ERPs). When the pronoun disagreed with the verb (and agreed with the subject), a P600 was recorded, while the opposite condition elicited no reliable effect. Our data suggest that interpretation of reflexive pronouns involves the reactivation of multiple lexical items, verbs included.
2
N., Molinaro; A., Kim; Vespignani, Francesco; Job, Remo
Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation / N., Molinaro; A., Kim; Vespignani, Francesco; Job, Remo. - In: COGNITION. - ISSN 0010-0277. - STAMPA. - 106:2(2008), pp. 963-974. [10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.006]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Molinaro et al. Cognition 2008.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 319.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
319.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/30046
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact